Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GOPIX vs MCDFX
GOPIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GOPIX vs MCDFX
abrdn China A Share Equity Inst
Price$27.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.92M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.97
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GOPIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GOPIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOPIX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GOPIX (15.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GOPIX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GOPIX (1.02). GOPIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GOPIX (21 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GOPIX (2.16) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GOPIX (61.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GOPIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GOPIX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.40 vs. GOPIX (23.09). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.41 vs. GOPIX (-17.47).
| GOPIX | MCDFX | GOPIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.32 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.891 | 28.193 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.9M | 104M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 2.78 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.09 | 25.40 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 39.23 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | -4.41 | 396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.05 | 35.84 | 170% |