GORO
Price
$0.47
Change
+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
63.72M
75 days until earnings call
PLGDF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.04 (-3.85%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
65.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GORO vs PLGDF

Header iconGORO vs PLGDF Comparison
Open Charts GORO vs PLGDFBanner chart's image
Gold Resource
Price$0.47
Change+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization63.72M
PALISADES GOLD
Price$1.00
Change-$0.04 (-3.85%)
Volume$6.36K
Capitalization65.24M
GORO vs PLGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GORO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GORO vs. PLGDF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GORO is a StrongBuy and PLGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GORO: $0.46 vs. PLGDF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: GORO and PLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GORO: 32% vs. PLGDF: 31%
Market capitalization -- GORO: $63.72M vs. PLGDF: $65.24M
GORO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $63.72M. PLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $65.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GORO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GORO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GORO is a better buy in the long-term than PLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GORO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLGDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GORO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLGDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GORO is a better buy in the short-term than PLGDF.

Price Growth

GORO (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while PLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

GORO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLGDF($65.2M) and GORO($63.7M) have the same market capitalization . GORO YTD gains are higher at: 99.913 vs. PLGDF (8.096). GORO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -18.83M vs. PLGDF (-141.69M). PLGDF has more cash in the bank: 23.2M vs. GORO (12.7M). GORO has higher revenues than PLGDF: GORO (49.8M) vs PLGDF (0).
GOROPLGDFGORO / PLGDF
Capitalization63.7M65.2M98%
EBITDA-18.83M-141.69M13%
Gain YTD99.9138.0961,234%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue49.8M0-
Total Cash12.7M23.2M55%
Total Debt5.81MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GORO: Fundamental Ratings
GORO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOROPLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GORO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSMNF19.92N/A
N/A
Lastminute.com NV
LVXFF0.26N/A
N/A
Leviathan Gold Ltd.
CLILF2.09N/A
N/A
Capitaland Investment Ltd.
TGAUF9.01N/A
N/A
Target Global Acquisition I Corp.
LDGYY20.52N/A
N/A
Landis Gyr Group AG

GORO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GORO has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GORO jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GORO
1D Price
Change %
GORO100%
-0.39%
NEM - GORO
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
ODV - GORO
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
STLRF - GORO
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
LGDTF - GORO
33%
Poorly correlated
+14.17%
TORXF - GORO
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More

PLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLGDF and HYMC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLGDF and HYMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLGDF
1D Price
Change %
PLGDF100%
-3.85%
HYMC - PLGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
LVGLF - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
STLRF - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
GORO - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
AU - PLGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More