GORO
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
38.55M
25 days until earnings call
PLGDF
Price
$0.92
Change
+$0.03 (+3.37%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
107.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GORO vs PLGDF

Header iconGORO vs PLGDF Comparison
Open Charts GORO vs PLGDFBanner chart's image
Gold Resource
Price$0.59
Change-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Volume$2.19M
Capitalization38.55M
PALISADES GOLD
Price$0.92
Change+$0.03 (+3.37%)
Volume$5.31K
Capitalization107.61M
GORO vs PLGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GORO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GORO vs. PLGDF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GORO is a Hold and PLGDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GORO: $0.59 vs. PLGDF: $0.92)
Brand notoriety: GORO and PLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GORO: 125% vs. PLGDF: 53%
Market capitalization -- GORO: $38.55M vs. PLGDF: $107.61M
GORO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $38.55M. PLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $107.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GORO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GORO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GORO is a better buy in the long-term than PLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GORO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLGDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GORO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PLGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than GORO.

Price Growth

GORO (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.98% price change this week, while PLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

GORO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLGDF($108M) has a higher market cap than GORO($38.5M). GORO YTD gains are higher at: 156.410 vs. PLGDF (-0.551). GORO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.33M vs. PLGDF (-217.89M). PLGDF has more cash in the bank: 11M vs. GORO (6.71M). GORO has higher revenues than PLGDF: GORO (109M) vs PLGDF (0).
GOROPLGDFGORO / PLGDF
Capitalization38.5M108M36%
EBITDA7.33M-217.89M-3%
Gain YTD156.410-0.551-28,372%
P/E Ratio83.33N/A-
Revenue109M0-
Total Cash6.71M11M61%
Total Debt2.98MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GORO: Fundamental Ratings
GORO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOROPLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GORO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGIFF0.04N/A
N/A
Garibaldi Resources Corp.
CKPDY1.11N/A
N/A
Cookpad Inc
HUPHY3.94N/A
N/A
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust
CSLLY81.01-0.38
-0.47%
CSL Ltd.
DITTF98.20-1.89
-1.89%
Daito Trust Construction Co.

GORO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GORO has been loosely correlated with EGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GORO jumps, then EGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GORO
1D Price
Change %
GORO100%
-1.75%
EGO - GORO
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
KGC - GORO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
NEM - GORO
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
ODV - GORO
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
PLG - GORO
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More

PLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLGDF and HYMC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLGDF and HYMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLGDF
1D Price
Change %
PLGDF100%
+3.34%
HYMC - PLGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
LVGLF - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
STLRF - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
GORO - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.89%
EQMEF - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More