Ad is loading...
GPAFX vs RMFCX
GPAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMFCX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$56.98
Change+$0.28 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets496.36M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
GPAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GPAFX (496M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMFCX (1.37) vs GPAFX (0.93). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GPAFX (0.93) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMFCX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. GPAFX (-5.99). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. GPAFX (39.68).
| GPAFX | RMFCX | GPAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.053 | 1.270 | -4% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 496M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.37 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.99 | 5.35 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.68 | 17.29 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 56.16 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.02 | 60.33 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...