Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMFCX
GPAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMFCX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$58.61
Change+$0.37 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.25M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.96
Change+$0.32 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.64B
GPAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. GPAFX (507M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GPAFX (0.91). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GPAFX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMFCX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. GPAFX (-3.22). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.07 vs. GPAFX (39.27).
| GPAFX | RMFCX | GPAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.662 | 6.832 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 507M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.22 | 9.47 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.66 | 28.22 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.27 | 61.07 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.15 | 71.75 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement