Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMFCX
GPAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMFCX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$60.67
Change+$0.34 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets527.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.37B
GPAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GPAFX (527M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GPAFX (0.88). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GPAFX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMFCX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. GPAFX (-0.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. GPAFX (44.44).
| GPAFX | RMFCX | GPAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.346 | 9.596 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 11.47 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.47 | 29.27 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.44 | 61.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.37 | 79.21 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers