GPAGF
Price
$17.41
Change
+$2.45 (+16.38%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.17B
GRBMF
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.07 (-2.36%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
12.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPAGF vs GRBMF

Header iconGPAGF vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GPAGF vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Gruma S.A.B. de CV
Price$17.41
Change+$2.45 (+16.38%)
Volume$875
Capitalization6.17B
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.90
Change-$0.07 (-2.36%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization12.94B
GPAGF vs GRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPAGF vs. GRBMF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAGF is a Buy and GRBMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GPAGF: $17.41 vs. GRBMF: $2.90)
Brand notoriety: GPAGF and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPAGF: 88% vs. GRBMF: 43%
Market capitalization -- GPAGF: $6.17B vs. GRBMF: $12.94B
GPAGF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $6.17B. GRBMF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $12.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the long-term than GRBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GPAGF and GRBMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GPAGF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($12.9B) has a higher market cap than GPAGF($6.17B). GRBMF has higher P/E ratio than GPAGF: GRBMF (20.11) vs GPAGF (11.53). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 11.904 vs. GPAGF (8.790). GRBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.1B vs. GPAGF (1.08B). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. GPAGF (362M). GPAGF has less debt than GRBMF: GPAGF (1.84B) vs GRBMF (193B). GRBMF has higher revenues than GPAGF: GRBMF (427B) vs GPAGF (6.33B).
GPAGFGRBMFGPAGF / GRBMF
Capitalization6.17B12.9B48%
EBITDA1.08B58.1B2%
Gain YTD8.79011.90474%
P/E Ratio11.5320.1157%
Revenue6.33B427B1%
Total Cash362M8.12B4%
Total Debt1.84B193B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPAGF vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GPAGF
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4570
SMR RATING
1..100
3568
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRBMF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (58). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (70). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRBMF (68). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (58). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (83). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPAGFGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHFCAD1.71N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Canadian Dollar
EURCAD1.61N/A
N/A
Euro - Canadian Dollar
PXIIX22.57N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Equity Income I
USDJPY147.69N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Japan Yen
JPYCAD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Canadian Dollar

GPAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPAGF has been loosely correlated with FAMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPAGF jumps, then FAMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAGF
1D Price
Change %
GPAGF100%
N/A
FAMI - GPAGF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
HLNFF - GPAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GPAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GPAGF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
FTLF - GPAGF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
N/A
BMBOY - GRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLUC - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GRBMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More