GPAGF
Price
$17.59
Change
+$0.50 (+2.93%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.91B
GRBMF
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.32 (+12.45%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPAGF vs GRBMF

Header iconGPAGF vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GPAGF vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Gruma S.A.B. de CV
Price$17.59
Change+$0.50 (+2.93%)
Volume$280
Capitalization6.91B
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.89
Change+$0.32 (+12.45%)
Volume$7.35K
Capitalization23.09B
GPAGF vs GRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPAGF vs. GRBMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAGF is a Buy and GRBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GPAGF: $17.59 vs. GRBMF: $2.89)
Brand notoriety: GPAGF and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPAGF: 29% vs. GRBMF: 280%
Market capitalization -- GPAGF: $6.91B vs. GRBMF: $23.09B
GPAGF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.91B. GRBMF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $23.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the long-term than GRBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the short-term than GRBMF.

Price Growth

GPAGF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +9.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPAGF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

GRBMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.12% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($23.1B) has a higher market cap than GPAGF($6.91B). GPAGF has higher P/E ratio than GRBMF: GPAGF (16.68) vs GRBMF (12.17). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 11.518 vs. GPAGF (9.969). GRBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.7B vs. GPAGF (727M). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. GPAGF (239M). GPAGF has less debt than GRBMF: GPAGF (1.71B) vs GRBMF (120B). GRBMF has higher revenues than GPAGF: GRBMF (408B) vs GPAGF (5B).
GPAGFGRBMFGPAGF / GRBMF
Capitalization6.91B23.1B30%
EBITDA727M71.7B1%
Gain YTD9.96911.51887%
P/E Ratio16.6812.17137%
Revenue5B408B1%
Total Cash239M7.19B3%
Total Debt1.71B120B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPAGF vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GPAGF
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3787
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4073
SMR RATING
1..100
3466
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8267
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRBMF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (62). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRBMF (73). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (66). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (64). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (82). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPAGFGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCCR25.460.08
+0.33%
Schwab® Core Bond ETF
BYM10.390.03
+0.29%
BLACKROCK Municipal Income QUALITY TRUST
IQDY33.420.05
+0.15%
FlexShares Intl Qual Div Dynamic ETF
JHDV38.43N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
UNIY48.62N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Voya Yld Enh USD Unvsl Bd Fd

GPAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPAGF has been loosely correlated with FAMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPAGF jumps, then FAMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAGF
1D Price
Change %
GPAGF100%
N/A
FAMI - GPAGF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
HLNFF - GPAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GPAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+12.67%
FPAFY - GPAGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
FTLF - GPAGF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
+12.67%
BMBOY - GRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+11.51%
GLUC - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
GCHOY - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More