GPFOF
Price
$2.65
Change
+$0.42 (+18.83%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
NODB
Price
$56.25
Change
+$1.25 (+2.27%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
98.4M
Ad is loading...

GPFOF vs NODB

Header iconGPFOF vs NODB Comparison
Open Charts GPFOF vs NODBBanner chart's image
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.65
Change+$0.42 (+18.83%)
Volume$500
Capitalization14.96B
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
Price$56.25
Change+$1.25 (+2.27%)
Volume$200
Capitalization98.4M
GPFOF vs NODB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPFOF vs. NODB commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPFOF is a Hold and NODB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (GPFOF: $2.65 vs. NODB: $56.25)
Brand notoriety: GPFOF and NODB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPFOF: 38% vs. NODB: 67%
Market capitalization -- GPFOF: $14.96B vs. NODB: $98.4M
GPFOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.96B. NODB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $98.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPFOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNODB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NODB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than NODB.

Price Growth

GPFOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NODB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than NODB($98.4M). NODB YTD gains are higher at: 25.228 vs. GPFOF (12.766). NODB has less debt than GPFOF: NODB (5.45M) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than NODB: GPFOF (62.4B) vs NODB (28.7M).
GPFOFNODBGPFOF / NODB
Capitalization15B98.4M15,244%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.76625.22851%
P/E Ratio9.60N/A-
Revenue62.4B28.7M217,422%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt68.2B5.45M1,252,525%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPFOF vs NODB: Fundamental Ratings
GPFOF
NODB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3339
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2681
SMR RATING
1..100
127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPFOF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (87). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODB (81). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (27). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (43). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (43). This means that NODB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFNCX78.230.10
+0.13%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R3
TPYCX8.68N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq C
VSEAX37.28N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity A
NIQAX13.70N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Eq A
FTVAX31.49N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val A

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NODB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NODB and CWBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NODB and CWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODB
1D Price
Change %
NODB100%
N/A
CWBK - NODB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLBK - NODB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
GPFOF - NODB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
SPXXF - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More