GPHBF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.47M
MTX
Price
$76.16
Change
+$0.61 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GPHBF vs MTX

Header iconGPHBF vs MTX Comparison
Open Charts GPHBF vs MTXBanner chart's image
G6 Materials
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$136.97K
Capitalization2.47M
Minerals Technologies
Price$76.16
Change+$0.61 (+0.81%)
Volume$102.23K
Capitalization2.4B
GPHBF vs MTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GPHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPHBF vs. MTX commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPHBF is a Hold and MTX is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GPHBF: $0.21 vs. MTX: $76.16)
Brand notoriety: GPHBF and MTX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPHBF: 211% vs. MTX: 69%
Market capitalization -- GPHBF: $2.47M vs. MTX: $2.4B
GPHBF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.47M. MTX’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPHBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPHBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPHBF is a better buy in the long-term than MTX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPHBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPHBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPHBF is a better buy in the short-term than MTX.

Price Growth

GPHBF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +200.07% price change this week, while MTX (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +5.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.41% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTX($2.4B) has a higher market cap than GPHBF($2.47M). GPHBF YTD gains are higher at: 332.202 vs. MTX (-0.066). MTX has more cash in the bank: 322M vs. GPHBF (1.15M). GPHBF has less debt than MTX: GPHBF (86K) vs MTX (1.01B).
GPHBFMTXGPHBF / MTX
Capitalization2.47M2.4B0%
EBITDAN/A262M-
Gain YTD332.202-0.066-506,388%
P/E RatioN/A28.70-
RevenueN/A2.17B-
Total Cash1.15M322M0%
Total Debt86K1.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPHBF vs MTX: Fundamental Ratings
GPHBF
MTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
9972
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTX's Valuation (74) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GPHBF (97) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew similarly to GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.

MTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPHBF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.

MTX's SMR Rating (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GPHBF (99) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew similarly to GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.

GPHBF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MTX (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GPHBF’s stock grew similarly to MTX’s over the last 12 months.

MTX's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GPHBF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew similarly to GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPHBFMTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GPHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEAX16.800.12
+0.72%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity A
VBINX49.150.28
+0.57%
Vanguard Balanced Index Inv
TAAGX13.080.07
+0.54%
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl A
BRSDX15.030.06
+0.40%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq A
RLNAX41.570.12
+0.29%
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A

GPHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPHBF and TYNPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPHBF and TYNPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPHBF
1D Price
Change %
GPHBF100%
+0.02%
TYNPF - GPHBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTX - GPHBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
GVDNY - GPHBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
GLGI - GPHBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
GNENF - GPHBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More