GPHOF
Price
$0.54
Change
+$0.01 (+1.89%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
129.08M
GPPRF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.83M
Ad is loading...

GPHOF vs GPPRF

Header iconGPHOF vs GPPRF Comparison
Open Charts GPHOF vs GPPRFBanner chart's image
Graphite One
Price$0.54
Change+$0.01 (+1.89%)
Volume$72.72K
Capitalization129.08M
Cerro De Pasco Res
Price$0.21
Change+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Volume$256.21K
Capitalization26.83M
GPHOF vs GPPRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GPHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPHOF vs. GPPRF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPHOF is a Hold and GPPRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GPHOF: $0.54 vs. GPPRF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: GPHOF and GPPRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPHOF: 88% vs. GPPRF: 124%
Market capitalization -- GPHOF: $129.08M vs. GPPRF: $26.83M
GPHOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $129.08M. GPPRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPHOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGPPRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPHOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GPPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPHOF is a better buy in the long-term than GPPRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPHOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPPRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPHOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GPPRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPHOF is a better buy in the short-term than GPPRF.

Price Growth

GPHOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.87% price change this week, while GPPRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPHOF is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPHOF($129M) has a higher market cap than GPPRF($26.8M). GPHOF YTD gains are higher at: 14.281 vs. GPPRF (6.104). GPHOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.65M vs. GPPRF (-20.05M). GPPRF has more cash in the bank: 1.53M vs. GPHOF (1.19M). GPHOF has less debt than GPPRF: GPHOF (116K) vs GPPRF (1.79M). GPPRF has higher revenues than GPHOF: GPPRF (38.3M) vs GPHOF (0).
GPHOFGPPRFGPHOF / GPPRF
Capitalization129M26.8M481%
EBITDA-6.65M-20.05M33%
Gain YTD14.2816.104234%
P/E RatioN/A64.10-
Revenue038.3M-
Total Cash1.19M1.53M78%
Total Debt116K1.79M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPHOF vs GPPRF: Fundamental Ratings
GPHOF
GPPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10079
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPHOF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPPRF (85). This means that GPHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.

GPHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GPPRF (100). This means that GPHOF’s stock grew similarly to GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.

GPHOF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GPPRF (100). This means that GPHOF’s stock grew similarly to GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.

GPPRF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GPHOF (55). This means that GPPRF’s stock grew similarly to GPHOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPPRF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GPHOF (100). This means that GPPRF’s stock grew similarly to GPHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPHOFGPPRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
89%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GPHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUTU87.537.13
+8.87%
Futu Holdings Limited
BABA85.122.69
+3.26%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
THRM40.140.61
+1.54%
Gentherm
MRSN0.62N/A
+0.68%
Mersana Therapeutics
MCS19.820.06
+0.30%
Marcus Corp (The)

GPHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPHOF has been loosely correlated with SLROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPHOF jumps, then SLROF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPHOF
1D Price
Change %
GPHOF100%
+1.99%
SLROF - GPHOF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - GPHOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - GPHOF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HANNF - GPHOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
GPPRF - GPHOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+10.90%
More

GPPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPPRF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPPRF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPPRF
1D Price
Change %
GPPRF100%
+10.90%
TMQ - GPPRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
YWRLF - GPPRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVDF - GPPRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAK - GPPRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
DRCMF - GPPRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More