GPLS
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
30.2K
TRUG
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
16.97M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPLS vs TRUG

Header iconGPLS vs TRUG Comparison
Open Charts GPLS vs TRUGBanner chart's image
Geopulse Exploration
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization30.2K
TruGolf Holdings
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.85M
Capitalization16.97M
GPLS vs TRUG Comparison Chart
Loading...
TRUG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPLS vs. TRUG commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPLS is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GPLS: $0.05 vs. TRUG: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: GPLS and TRUG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPLS: 4% vs. TRUG: 35%
Market capitalization -- GPLS: $30.2K vs. TRUG: $16.97M
GPLS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $30.2K. TRUG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $16.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPLS is a better buy in the long-term than TRUG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRUG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRUG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

GPLS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +29.89% price change this week, while TRUG (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRUG is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRUG($17M) has a higher market cap than GPLS($30.2K). GPLS YTD gains are higher at: 92.149 vs. TRUG (-66.145). TRUG has more cash in the bank: 178K vs. GPLS (25.9K). GPLS has less debt than TRUG: GPLS (56K) vs TRUG (2.15M).
GPLSTRUGGPLS / TRUG
Capitalization30.2K17M0%
EBITDA-37.97KN/A-
Gain YTD92.149-66.145-139%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash25.9K178K15%
Total Debt56K2.15M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPLS: Fundamental Ratings
GPLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TRUG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYOTX10.530.15
+1.45%
Royce Micro-Cap Invmt
DDERX14.870.07
+0.47%
Macquarie Wealth Builder R6
TFESX12.42N/A
N/A
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Service
TRMIX30.68N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value I
ACIZX49.12N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl Z-2

GPLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPLS and NCNO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPLS and NCNO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPLS
1D Price
Change %
GPLS100%
+21.76%
NCNO - GPLS
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WIGBY - GPLS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - GPLS
21%
Poorly correlated
-17.66%
TRUG - GPLS
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
AUID - GPLS
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
More

TRUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with CALX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then CALX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUG
1D Price
Change %
TRUG100%
-3.28%
CALX - TRUG
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
MARK - TRUG
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
DASTY - TRUG
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
KGDEF - TRUG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQ - TRUG
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More