It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPPRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GPPRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.02% price change this week, while TMQ (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.26%.
TMQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 09, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
GPPRF | TMQ | GPPRF / TMQ | |
Capitalization | 26.8M | 82.8M | 32% |
EBITDA | -20.05M | -7.21M | 278% |
Gain YTD | 1.729 | 34.483 | 5% |
P/E Ratio | 64.10 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 38.3M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 1.53M | 2.59M | 59% |
Total Debt | 1.79M | 33K | 5,418% |
GPPRF | TMQ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TMQ's Valuation (50) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPPRF (85) in the null industry. This means that TMQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.
TMQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GPPRF (100) in the null industry. This means that TMQ’s stock grew similarly to GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.
TMQ's SMR Rating (92) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GPPRF (100) in the null industry. This means that TMQ’s stock grew similarly to GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.
TMQ's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GPPRF (36) in the null industry. This means that TMQ’s stock grew similarly to GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.
TMQ's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPPRF (70) in the null industry. This means that TMQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPPRF’s over the last 12 months.
GPPRF | TMQ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago63% | 11 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BITS | 54.15 | 1.45 | +2.75% |
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Str ETF | |||
SPMD | 52.27 | 0.81 | +1.57% |
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF | |||
QMOM | 60.28 | 0.80 | +1.34% |
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF | |||
ROBO | 52.03 | 0.56 | +1.09% |
Robo Global® Robotics&Automation ETF | |||
UMAR | 35.81 | 0.20 | +0.56% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Mar |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GPPRF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPPRF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPPRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPPRF | 100% | -5.21% | ||
TMQ - GPPRF | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
SLVDF - GPPRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
NAK - GPPRF | 20% Poorly correlated | -18.02% | ||
GVXXF - GPPRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.08% | ||
HANNF - GPPRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMQ has been loosely correlated with NAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMQ jumps, then NAK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TMQ | 100% | -1.89% | ||
NAK - TMQ | 38% Loosely correlated | -18.02% | ||
GENMF - TMQ | 33% Poorly correlated | -8.64% | ||
HBM - TMQ | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
GPPRF - TMQ | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.21% | ||
ECRAF - TMQ | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |