GPTRF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.81M
NIOVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPTRF vs NIOVF

Header iconGPTRF vs NIOVF Comparison
Open Charts GPTRF vs NIOVFBanner chart's image
Grande Portage Resources
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24K
Capitalization20.81M
Plato Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$70K
Capitalization4.99M
GPTRF vs NIOVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPTRF vs. NIOVF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPTRF is a Hold and NIOVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GPTRF: $0.14 vs. NIOVF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: GPTRF and NIOVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPTRF: 26% vs. NIOVF: 168%
Market capitalization -- GPTRF: $20.81M vs. NIOVF: $4.99M
GPTRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.81M. NIOVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPTRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIOVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIOVF is a better buy in the long-term than GPTRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPTRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIOVF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPTRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NIOVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIOVF is a better buy in the short-term than GPTRF.

Price Growth

GPTRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.63% price change this week, while NIOVF (@Precious Metals) price change was -24.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPTRF($20.8M) has a higher market cap than NIOVF($4.99M). NIOVF YTD gains are higher at: 19.048 vs. GPTRF (8.675). NIOVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -176.05K vs. GPTRF (-1.19M). GPTRF has more cash in the bank: 815K vs. NIOVF (62.6K). GPTRF (0) and NIOVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GPTRFNIOVFGPTRF / NIOVF
Capitalization20.8M4.99M417%
EBITDA-1.19M-176.05K674%
Gain YTD8.67519.04846%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash815K62.6K1,302%
Total Debt116KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPTRF vs NIOVF: Fundamental Ratings
GPTRF
NIOVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPTRF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NIOVF (61). This means that GPTRF’s stock grew similarly to NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

GPTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NIOVF (100). This means that GPTRF’s stock grew similarly to NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

GPTRF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NIOVF (95). This means that GPTRF’s stock grew similarly to NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPTRF (77). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPTRF’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GPTRF (100). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to GPTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPTRFNIOVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWOX405.004.99
+1.25%
Goodheart-Willcox Co. (THE), Inc.
MTHRF13.77N/A
N/A
M3, Inc.
MWTCY17.40N/A
N/A
Manila Water Co., Inc.
BXDIF8.42N/A
N/A
BROOKFIELD CORP.
CHKR0.43N/A
-0.92%
Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust

GPTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPTRF has been loosely correlated with RGLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPTRF jumps, then RGLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPTRF
1D Price
Change %
GPTRF100%
-0.40%
RGLD - GPTRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
SAND - GPTRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
PAAS - GPTRF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
NGD - GPTRF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
EQX - GPTRF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

NIOVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIOVF and GPTRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIOVF and GPTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIOVF
1D Price
Change %
NIOVF100%
-26.14%
GPTRF - NIOVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
KGLDF - NIOVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USAU - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
GSTMF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.77%
AIRRF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
More