GRAM
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.46M
IMBBF
Price
$39.51
Change
+$0.96 (+2.49%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
32.12B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRAM vs IMBBF

Header iconGRAM vs IMBBF Comparison
Open Charts GRAM vs IMBBFBanner chart's image
GOLD FLORA
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$78.26K
Capitalization9.46M
Imperial Brands
Price$39.51
Change+$0.96 (+2.49%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization32.12B
GRAM vs IMBBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRAM vs. IMBBF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRAM is a Hold and IMBBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GRAM: $0.04 vs. IMBBF: $39.51)
Brand notoriety: GRAM and IMBBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRAM: 100% vs. IMBBF: 29%
Market capitalization -- GRAM: $9.46M vs. IMBBF: $32.12B
GRAM [@Tobacco] is valued at $9.46M. IMBBF’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $32.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $282.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $30.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIMBBF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GRAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IMBBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMBBF is a better buy in the long-term than GRAM.

Price Growth

GRAM (@Tobacco) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IMBBF (@Tobacco) price change was +5.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

IMBBF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (+0.32% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMBBF($32.1B) has a higher market cap than GRAM($9.46M). GRAM YTD gains are higher at: 52.000 vs. IMBBF (24.323). IMBBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.14B vs. GRAM (-59.6M). IMBBF has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. GRAM (10.2M). GRAM has less debt than IMBBF: GRAM (164M) vs IMBBF (9.08B). IMBBF has higher revenues than GRAM: IMBBF (32.4B) vs GRAM (125M).
GRAMIMBBFGRAM / IMBBF
Capitalization9.46M32.1B0%
EBITDA-59.6M4.14B-1%
Gain YTD52.00024.323214%
P/E RatioN/A9.73-
Revenue125M32.4B0%
Total Cash10.2M1.08B1%
Total Debt164M9.08B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRAM vs IMBBF: Fundamental Ratings
GRAM
IMBBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4616
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMBBF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRAM (76). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRAM (100). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GRAM (100). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew similarly to GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GRAM (62). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew similarly to GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRAM (100). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCI20.970.13
+0.62%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdStrK1Fr ETF
DIM74.240.14
+0.19%
WisdomTree International MidCap Div ETF
CUBA2.41N/A
N/A
Herzfeld Caribbean Basin Fund
ELC20.25-0.10
-0.52%
Entergy Louisiana LLC
SPXS5.20-0.17
-3.17%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Bear 3X ETF

GRAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRAM and VPRB have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRAM and VPRB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAM
1D Price
Change %
GRAM100%
N/A
VPRB - GRAM
7%
Poorly correlated
-24.56%
JAPAY - GRAM
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
IMBBF - GRAM
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
IMBBY - GRAM
-5%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
GDNGY - GRAM
-8%
Poorly correlated
+11.63%
More

IMBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMBBF and BTAFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMBBF and BTAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMBBF
1D Price
Change %
IMBBF100%
+2.48%
BTAFF - IMBBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
PHJMF - IMBBF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPAF - IMBBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMBBY - IMBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
GDNGY - IMBBF
0%
Poorly correlated
+11.63%
More