GRCAF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
18.38M
LVGLF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
22.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCAF vs LVGLF

Header iconGRCAF vs LVGLF Comparison
Open Charts GRCAF vs LVGLFBanner chart's image
GOLD SPRINGS RESOURCE
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$18.48K
Capitalization18.38M
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.73K
Capitalization22.59M
GRCAF vs LVGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCAF vs. LVGLF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCAF is a Hold and LVGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCAF: $0.07 vs. LVGLF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: GRCAF and LVGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCAF: 89% vs. LVGLF: 119%
Market capitalization -- GRCAF: $18.38M vs. LVGLF: $22.59M
GRCAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $18.38M. LVGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLVGLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the long-term than GRCAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVGLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRCAF is a better buy in the short-term than LVGLF.

Price Growth

GRCAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.52% price change this week, while LVGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVGLF($22.6M) has a higher market cap than GRCAF($18.4M). LVGLF YTD gains are higher at: 44.083 vs. GRCAF (36.296). GRCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -571.81K vs. LVGLF (-1.86M). LVGLF has more cash in the bank: 114K vs. GRCAF (16.9K). GRCAF has less debt than LVGLF: GRCAF (27.8K) vs LVGLF (1.02M). GRCAF (0) and LVGLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRCAFLVGLFGRCAF / LVGLF
Capitalization18.4M22.6M81%
EBITDA-571.81K-1.86M31%
Gain YTD36.29644.08382%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.9K114K15%
Total Debt27.8K1.02M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCAF vs LVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCAF
LVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
142
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVGLF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (67). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (100). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (96). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (53). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (100). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCAFLVGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFSIA15.000.50
+3.45%
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.
GSCCF0.07N/A
+1.24%
Ioneer Ltd.
RDEIY9.710.10
+1.07%
Redeia Corporacion SA
CLYYF0.41N/A
N/A
Celyad Oncology SA
IMYSY5.50N/A
N/A
IMERYS SA

GRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCAF and RMLFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCAF and RMLFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCAF
1D Price
Change %
GRCAF100%
-5.28%
RMLFF - GRCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.49%
LVGLF - GRCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
JUPGF - GRCAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.25%
GPTRF - GRCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
HCHDF - GRCAF
-10%
Poorly correlated
-9.52%
More

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVGLF and PLGDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVGLF and PLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
+2.65%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
GRCAF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
WGXRF - LVGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
FDMIF - LVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More