GRCMF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.48M
HUSIF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
143.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCMF vs HUSIF

Header iconGRCMF vs HUSIF Comparison
Open Charts GRCMF vs HUSIFBanner chart's image
GREEN SHIFT COMMODITIES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization4.48M
Nicola Mining
Price$0.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.15K
Capitalization143.41M
GRCMF vs HUSIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCMF vs. HUSIF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCMF is a StrongBuy and HUSIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCMF: $0.02 vs. HUSIF: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: GRCMF and HUSIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCMF: 7% vs. HUSIF: 56%
Market capitalization -- GRCMF: $4.48M vs. HUSIF: $143.41M
GRCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.48M. HUSIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $143.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUSIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUSIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUSIF is a better buy in the long-term than GRCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUSIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUSIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRCMF is a better buy in the short-term than HUSIF.

Price Growth

GRCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.46% price change this week, while HUSIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUSIF($143M) has a higher market cap than GRCMF($4.48M). HUSIF has higher P/E ratio than GRCMF: HUSIF (85.56) vs GRCMF (0.84). HUSIF YTD gains are higher at: 283.396 vs. GRCMF (-1.195). HUSIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -91.6K vs. GRCMF (-5.81M). HUSIF has more cash in the bank: 5.1M vs. GRCMF (3.79M). GRCMF has less debt than HUSIF: GRCMF (133K) vs HUSIF (4.14M). HUSIF has higher revenues than GRCMF: HUSIF (823K) vs GRCMF (0).
GRCMFHUSIFGRCMF / HUSIF
Capitalization4.48M143M3%
EBITDA-5.81M-91.6K6,344%
Gain YTD-1.195283.396-0%
P/E Ratio0.8485.561%
Revenue0823K-
Total Cash3.79M5.1M74%
Total Debt133K4.14M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCMF vs HUSIF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCMF
HUSIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2889
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
9899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9710
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRCMF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUSIF (91). This means that GRCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUSIF’s over the last 12 months.

HUSIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRCMF (100). This means that HUSIF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRCMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCMF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as HUSIF (99). This means that GRCMF’s stock grew similarly to HUSIF’s over the last 12 months.

HUSIF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCMF (45). This means that HUSIF’s stock grew similarly to GRCMF’s over the last 12 months.

HUSIF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRCMF (97). This means that HUSIF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCMFHUSIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHL26.410.11
+0.42%
Scholastic Corp
SAMG15.96-0.06
-0.37%
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
SW42.28-0.97
-2.24%
Smurfit WestRock plc
CARV2.26-0.06
-2.50%
Carver Bancorp
JOYY59.38-2.10
-3.42%
JOYY Inc

GRCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRCMF has been loosely correlated with MKRIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRCMF jumps, then MKRIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCMF
1D Price
Change %
GRCMF100%
N/A
MKRIF - GRCMF
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.09%
HUSIF - GRCMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
MLPNF - GRCMF
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
LUCMF - GRCMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
CAPFF - GRCMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HUSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HUSIF and MKRIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUSIF and MKRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUSIF
1D Price
Change %
HUSIF100%
+0.27%
MKRIF - HUSIF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
MNXMF - HUSIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
DETRF - HUSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
GRCMF - HUSIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPFF - HUSIF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More