GRCMF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.11M
LUCMF
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.01 (-0.96%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCMF vs LUCMF

Header iconGRCMF vs LUCMF Comparison
Open Charts GRCMF vs LUCMFBanner chart's image
GREEN SHIFT COMMODITIES
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization7.11M
LUCA MINING
Price$1.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.96%)
Volume$138.27K
Capitalization49.71M
GRCMF vs LUCMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCMF vs. LUCMF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCMF is a Hold and LUCMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCMF: $0.02 vs. LUCMF: $1.03)
Brand notoriety: GRCMF and LUCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCMF: 28% vs. LUCMF: 37%
Market capitalization -- GRCMF: $7.11M vs. LUCMF: $49.71M
GRCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.11M. LUCMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $49.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUCMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the long-term than GRCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUCMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LUCMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the short-term than GRCMF.

Price Growth

GRCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.42% price change this week, while LUCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRCMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUCMF($49.7M) has a higher market cap than GRCMF($7.11M). LUCMF YTD gains are higher at: 164.812 vs. GRCMF (-26.096). GRCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.58M vs. LUCMF (-4.28M). LUCMF (3.62M) and GRCMF (3.51M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GRCMF has less debt than LUCMF: GRCMF (228K) vs LUCMF (43.8M). LUCMF has higher revenues than GRCMF: LUCMF (65.1M) vs GRCMF (0).
GRCMFLUCMFGRCMF / LUCMF
Capitalization7.11M49.7M14%
EBITDA-3.58M-4.28M84%
Gain YTD-26.096164.812-16%
P/E RatioN/A1.17-
Revenue065.1M-
Total Cash3.51M3.62M97%
Total Debt228K43.8M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCMF vs LUCMF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCMF
LUCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
7694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
975
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRCMF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUCMF (76). This means that GRCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCMF (100). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to GRCMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCMF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (94). This means that GRCMF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCMF (64). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to GRCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRCMF (97). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCMFLUCMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLI0.170.02
+11.94%
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp
AAP51.622.61
+5.33%
Advance Auto Parts
SJT6.220.11
+1.80%
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust UBI
ABCL3.800.05
+1.33%
AbCellera Biologics
BDX176.16-1.11
-0.63%
Becton Dickinson and Co

GRCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRCMF has been loosely correlated with MKRIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRCMF jumps, then MKRIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCMF
1D Price
Change %
GRCMF100%
N/A
MKRIF - GRCMF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
HUSIF - GRCMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
MLPNF - GRCMF
18%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
LUCMF - GRCMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
CAPFF - GRCMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LUCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCMF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCMF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCMF
1D Price
Change %
LUCMF100%
-0.72%
AAGFF - LUCMF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
AOTVF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUNMF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
TGB - LUCMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
ARREF - LUCMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More