GRCMF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.11M
MLPNF
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.05 (-4.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCMF vs MLPNF

Header iconGRCMF vs MLPNF Comparison
Open Charts GRCMF vs MLPNFBanner chart's image
GREEN SHIFT COMMODITIES
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization7.11M
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$1.03
Change-$0.05 (-4.63%)
Volume$6.55K
Capitalization14.65M
GRCMF vs MLPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCMF vs. MLPNF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCMF is a Hold and MLPNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCMF: $0.02 vs. MLPNF: $1.03)
Brand notoriety: GRCMF and MLPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCMF: 28% vs. MLPNF: 18%
Market capitalization -- GRCMF: $7.11M vs. MLPNF: $14.65M
GRCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.11M. MLPNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $14.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLPNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRCMF and MLPNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLPNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRCMF is a better buy in the short-term than MLPNF.

Price Growth

GRCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.42% price change this week, while MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRCMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($14.7M) has a higher market cap than GRCMF($7.11M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 375.860 vs. GRCMF (-26.096). MLPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.1M vs. GRCMF (-3.58M). GRCMF has more cash in the bank: 3.51M vs. MLPNF (1.9M). MLPNF has less debt than GRCMF: MLPNF (0) vs GRCMF (228K). GRCMF (0) and MLPNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRCMFMLPNFGRCMF / MLPNF
Capitalization7.11M14.7M48%
EBITDA-3.58M-3.1M115%
Gain YTD-26.096375.860-7%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.51M1.9M184%
Total Debt228K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCMF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCMFMLPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNNLF2.130.03
+1.43%
BANNERMAN ENERGY LTD.
SHTDY11.770.04
+0.35%
Sinopharm Group Co. Ltd.
CTNR5.01N/A
N/A
Central Natural Resources, Inc.
YUEIF1.47N/A
N/A
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
BHDB84.00N/A
N/A
Bank of Labor Bancshares Inc.

GRCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRCMF has been loosely correlated with MKRIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRCMF jumps, then MKRIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCMF
1D Price
Change %
GRCMF100%
N/A
MKRIF - GRCMF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
HUSIF - GRCMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
MLPNF - GRCMF
18%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
LUCMF - GRCMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
CAPFF - GRCMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and SIERF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and SIERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
-4.62%
SIERF - MLPNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USCUF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.61%
GRCMF - MLPNF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGO - MLPNF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More