GRGCF
Price
$20.00
Change
+$1.70 (+9.29%)
Updated
Mar 17 closing price
Capitalization
685.57M
ILXP
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
May 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.4M
Ad is loading...

GRGCF vs ILXP

Header iconGRGCF vs ILXP Comparison
Open Charts GRGCF vs ILXPBanner chart's image
GEORGIA CAPITAL
Price$20.00
Change+$1.70 (+9.29%)
Volume$100
Capitalization685.57M
International Luxury Products
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization6.4M
GRGCF vs ILXP Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRGCF vs. ILXP commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGCF is a Hold and ILXP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GRGCF: $20.00 vs. ILXP: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: GRGCF and ILXP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRGCF: 19% vs. ILXP: 100%
Market capitalization -- GRGCF: $685.57M vs. ILXP: $6.4M
GRGCF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $685.57M. ILXP’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $6.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRGCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileILXP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRGCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ILXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRGCF is a better buy in the long-term than ILXP.

Price Growth

GRGCF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ILXP (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.29% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRGCF($686M) has a higher market cap than ILXP($6.4M). GRGCF YTD gains are higher at: 55.400 vs. ILXP (0.000).
GRGCFILXPGRGCF / ILXP
Capitalization686M6.4M10,715%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD55.4000.000-
P/E Ratio6.00N/A-
Revenue181MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRGCF vs ILXP: Fundamental Ratings
GRGCF
ILXP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4737
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
82100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILXP's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRGCF (57). This means that ILXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ILXP (100). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ILXP’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ILXP (100). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew similarly to ILXP’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ILXP (47). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew similarly to ILXP’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ILXP (100). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ILXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAAAX12.19N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Assets A
JGYCX11.68N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield C
WPOIX11.47N/A
N/A
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Investor
GINUX23.36N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R6
PISVX10.99N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Intrinsic Value A

GRGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGCF and FCIC have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGCF and FCIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGCF
1D Price
Change %
GRGCF100%
N/A
FCIC - GRGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGCO - GRGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILXP - GRGCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLH - GRGCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
IHAI - GRGCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More

ILXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILXP and KVACU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILXP and KVACU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILXP
1D Price
Change %
ILXP100%
N/A
KVACU - ILXP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKU - ILXP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHAI - ILXP
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
ETER - ILXP
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLH - ILXP
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
More