Ad is loading...
GRGSF
Price
$6.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
HERB
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GRGSF vs HERB

Header iconGRGSF vs HERB Comparison
Open Charts GRGSF vs HERBBanner chart's image
Grieg Seafood ASA
Price$6.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
YaSheng Group
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$625
CapitalizationN/A
GRGSF vs HERB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRGSF vs. HERB commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGSF is a Hold and HERB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GRGSF: $6.28 vs. HERB: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GRGSF and HERB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRGSF: 100% vs. HERB: 3%
Market capitalization -- GRGSF: $803.23M vs. HERB: $34.33M
GRGSF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $803.23M. HERB’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $34.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHERB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HERB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRGSF is a better buy in the long-term than HERB.

Price Growth

GRGSF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HERB (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-0.32% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRGSF($803M) has a higher market cap than HERB($34.3M). GRGSF has higher P/E ratio than HERB: GRGSF (8.49) vs HERB (0.08). HERB YTD gains are higher at: 10.569 vs. GRGSF (-5.847). GRGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.78B vs. HERB (127M). GRGSF has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. HERB (1.4M). HERB has less debt than GRGSF: HERB (45.7M) vs GRGSF (3.79B). GRGSF has higher revenues than HERB: GRGSF (7.25B) vs HERB (939M).
GRGSFHERBGRGSF / HERB
Capitalization803M34.3M2,341%
EBITDA1.78B127M1,403%
Gain YTD-5.84710.569-55%
P/E Ratio8.490.0810,130%
Revenue7.25B939M772%
Total Cash1.27B1.4M90,623%
Total Debt3.79B45.7M8,298%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRGSF vs HERB: Fundamental Ratings
GRGSF
HERB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
8972
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRGSF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (46). This means that GRGSF’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (100). This means that HERB’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (89). This means that HERB’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (70). This means that HERB’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRGSF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HERB (100). This means that GRGSF’s stock grew significantly faster than HERB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFAIX43.19-0.36
-0.83%
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
MCSPX12.33-0.17
-1.36%
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C
PAXGX16.98-0.26
-1.51%
Impax Global Opportunities Investor
WIGRX103.50-1.66
-1.58%
Wasatch Core Growth Institutional
UIVMX12.16-0.20
-1.62%
MFS Intrinsic Value R1

GRGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGSF and GRCLF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGSF and GRCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGSF
1D Price
Change %
GRGSF100%
N/A
GRCLF - GRGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
EDESY - GRGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPY - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GRGSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HERB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HERB and GRCLF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HERB and GRCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HERB
1D Price
Change %
HERB100%
N/A
GRCLF - HERB
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
EDESY - HERB
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - HERB
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - HERB
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSFD - HERB
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More