Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGTX vs RMFCX
GRGTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGTX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income I
Price$49.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GRGTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGTX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GRGTX (419M). GRGTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGTX (1.40) vs RMFCX (1.20). GRGTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGTX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GRGTX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . GRGTX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. GRGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GRGTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. GRGTX (2.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. GRGTX (43.08).
| GRGTX | RMFCX | GRGTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.828 | 14.983 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 419M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.20 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 7.84 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 43.87 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.08 | 58.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.41 | 94.24 | 96% |