Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGTX vs RMFCX
GRGTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGTX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income I
Price$46.32
Change-$0.09 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets396.06M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
GRGTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGTX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GRGTX (396M). GRGTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGTX (1.50) vs RMFCX (1.31). GRGTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGTX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GRGTX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . GRGTX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. GRGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GRGTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. GRGTX (2.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. GRGTX (35.89).
| GRGTX | RMFCX | GRGTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.430 | 5.423 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.31 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 8.44 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | 18.47 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.89 | 50.95 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.75 | 69.73 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement