Ad is loading...
GRGTX vs RMFCX
GRGTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGTX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income I
Price$44.55
Change-$1.76 (-3.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.59M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.14
Change-$1.81 (-3.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
GRGTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGTX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GRGTX (401M). GRGTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGTX (1.50) vs RMFCX (1.34). GRGTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGTX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GRGTX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . GRGTX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. GRGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GRGTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. GRGTX (1.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. GRGTX (65.26).
| GRGTX | RMFCX | GRGTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.702 | 2.814 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.34 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.63 | 6.77 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | 11.46 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.26 | 76.10 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.93 | 64.62 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...