Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGUX vs RMFCX
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R6
Price$51.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GRGUX (419M). GRGUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGUX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.20). GRGUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GRGUX (0.83). GRGUX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRGUX: RMFCX (250) vs GRGUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. GRGUX (2.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. GRGUX (44.21).
| GRGUX | RMFCX | GRGUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.885 | 14.983 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 419M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | 7.84 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.57 | 43.87 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.21 | 58.89 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.32 | 94.24 | 99% |