Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGUX vs RMFCX
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R6
Price$48.10
Change+$0.50 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets395.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GRGUX (395M). GRGUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGUX (1.51) vs RMFCX (1.31). GRGUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GRGUX (0.83). GRGUX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRGUX: RMFCX (250) vs GRGUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. GRGUX (2.92). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. GRGUX (36.71).
| GRGUX | RMFCX | GRGUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.271 | 5.919 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 395M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 9.01 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 17.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.71 | 51.66 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement