Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGUX vs RMFCX
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R6
Price$50.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.51M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GRGUX (415M). GRGUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGUX (1.48) vs RMFCX (1.26). GRGUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GRGUX (0.83). GRGUX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRGUX: RMFCX (250) vs GRGUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. GRGUX (3.15). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. GRGUX (41.66).
| GRGUX | RMFCX | GRGUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | 11.642 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 415M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.26 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | 6.98 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.19 | 29.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.66 | 54.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.61 | 91.22 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement