Ad is loading...
GRGUX vs RMFCX
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R6
Price$43.82
Change-$1.20 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.02M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.20
Change-$1.36 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGUX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. GRGUX (378M). GRGUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GRGUX (1.52) vs RMFCX (1.34). GRGUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GRGUX (0.83). GRGUX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRGUX: RMFCX (250) vs GRGUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. GRGUX (-2.35). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. GRGUX (42.05).
| GRGUX | RMFCX | GRGUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.272 | -1.578 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 378M | 98.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.35 | 3.11 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.72 | 7.15 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.05 | 55.06 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...