GRKZF
Price
$22.64
Change
+$0.50 (+2.26%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
GXYYY
Price
$26.16
Change
+$0.73 (+2.87%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
31.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRKZF vs GXYYY

Header iconGRKZF vs GXYYY Comparison
Open Charts GRKZF vs GXYYYBanner chart's image
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
Price$22.64
Change+$0.50 (+2.26%)
Volume$150
Capitalization6.5B
Galaxy Entertainment Group
Price$26.16
Change+$0.73 (+2.87%)
Volume$16.68K
Capitalization31.72B
GRKZF vs GXYYY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GXYYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRKZF vs. GXYYY commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRKZF is a Buy and GXYYY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GRKZF: $22.64 vs. GXYYY: $26.16)
Brand notoriety: GRKZF and GXYYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRKZF: 52% vs. GXYYY: 54%
Market capitalization -- GRKZF: $6.5B vs. GXYYY: $31.72B
GRKZF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.5B. GXYYY’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $31.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRKZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGXYYY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GRKZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GXYYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GXYYY is a better buy in the long-term than GRKZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRKZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GXYYY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRKZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GXYYY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GXYYY is a better buy in the short-term than GRKZF.

Price Growth

GRKZF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while GXYYY (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +7.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.08% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GXYYY($31.7B) has a higher market cap than GRKZF($6.5B). GXYYY has higher P/E ratio than GRKZF: GXYYY (140.85) vs GRKZF (16.56). GRKZF YTD gains are higher at: 38.386 vs. GXYYY (26.636). GXYYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. GRKZF (686M). GXYYY has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. GRKZF (600M). GRKZF has less debt than GXYYY: GRKZF (889M) vs GXYYY (9.29B). GXYYY has higher revenues than GRKZF: GXYYY (15.6B) vs GRKZF (1.3B).
GRKZFGXYYYGRKZF / GXYYY
Capitalization6.5B31.7B21%
EBITDA686M1.93B36%
Gain YTD38.38626.636144%
P/E Ratio16.56140.8512%
Revenue1.3B15.6B8%
Total Cash600M19.7B3%
Total Debt889M9.29B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRKZF vs GXYYY: Fundamental Ratings
GRKZF
GXYYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4768
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GXYYY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRKZF (90). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

GRKZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GXYYY (100). This means that GRKZF’s stock grew significantly faster than GXYYY’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as GRKZF (16). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GRKZF (44). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GRKZF (53). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRKZFGXYYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GXYYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOEX48.420.51
+1.06%
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
SDOG57.480.43
+0.75%
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
IPAY57.350.14
+0.25%
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
JCTR84.71N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Eq ETF
LIAU227.34N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF

GRKZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRKZF and GXYEF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRKZF and GXYEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRKZF
1D Price
Change %
GRKZF100%
N/A
GXYEF - GRKZF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - GRKZF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
MCHVY - GRKZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - GRKZF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
GOFPY - GRKZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GXYYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYYY has been closely correlated with SCHYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXYYY jumps, then SCHYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXYYY
1D Price
Change %
GXYYY100%
+2.87%
SCHYY - GXYYY
81%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
WYNMY - GXYYY
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
MLCO - GXYYY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
WYNN - GXYYY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
LVS - GXYYY
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More