GRLRF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.05 (-7.69%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
62.24M
LCGMF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
17.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLRF vs LCGMF

Header iconGRLRF vs LCGMF Comparison
Open Charts GRLRF vs LCGMFBanner chart's image
GREENLAND RES
Price$0.60
Change-$0.05 (-7.69%)
Volume$6.59K
Capitalization62.24M
LION COPPER & GOLD
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$78.73K
Capitalization17.52M
GRLRF vs LCGMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLRF vs. LCGMF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLRF is a Hold and LCGMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLRF: $0.60 vs. LCGMF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: GRLRF and LCGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLRF: 38% vs. LCGMF: 73%
Market capitalization -- GRLRF: $62.24M vs. LCGMF: $17.52M
GRLRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $62.24M. LCGMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLCGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LCGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRLRF and LCGMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GRLRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LCGMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +15.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

LCGMF is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.30% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLRF($62.2M) has a higher market cap than LCGMF($17.5M). LCGMF YTD gains are higher at: 121.617 vs. GRLRF (0.000). LCGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.23M vs. GRLRF (-5.5M). LCGMF has more cash in the bank: 10.6M vs. GRLRF (2.29M). GRLRF (0) and LCGMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLRFLCGMFGRLRF / LCGMF
Capitalization62.2M17.5M355%
EBITDA-5.5M-2.23M247%
Gain YTD0.000121.617-
P/E Ratio68.97N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.29M10.6M22%
Total DebtN/A2.81M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LCGMF: Fundamental Ratings
LCGMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIB.X0.0006470.000187
+40.58%
Viberate cryptocurrency
INJ.X14.0570311.663135
+13.42%
Injective cryptocurrency
SUSHI.X0.8054870.057093
+7.63%
SushiSwap cryptocurrency
API3.X0.9111890.058333
+6.84%
API3 cryptocurrency
CTXC.X0.0980470.001271
+1.31%
Cortex cryptocurrency

GRLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLRF and PPZRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLRF and PPZRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLRF
1D Price
Change %
GRLRF100%
-7.69%
PPZRF - GRLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYHBF - GRLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
THSGF - GRLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
NGXXF - GRLRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
NVLHF - GRLRF
18%
Poorly correlated
-7.13%
More

LCGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCGMF and NDMCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCGMF and NDMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCGMF
1D Price
Change %
LCGMF100%
+0.13%
NDMCF - LCGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOOF - LCGMF
15%
Poorly correlated
-12.72%
COPAF - LCGMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+9.94%
GRLRF - LCGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
ARAAF - LCGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
More