GRLVF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.56M
GSCCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
419.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLVF vs GSCCF

Header iconGRLVF vs GSCCF Comparison
Open Charts GRLVF vs GSCCFBanner chart's image
Group Eleven Resources
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$170.03K
Capitalization10.56M
Ioneer
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$15.25K
Capitalization419.26M
GRLVF vs GSCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLVF vs. GSCCF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLVF is a StrongBuy and GSCCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLVF: $0.30 vs. GSCCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GRLVF and GSCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLVF: 99% vs. GSCCF: 23%
Market capitalization -- GRLVF: $10.56M vs. GSCCF: $419.26M
GRLVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.56M. GSCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $419.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the long-term than GSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSCCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GRLVF and GSCCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GRLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +25.00% price change this week, while GSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSCCF($419M) has a higher market cap than GRLVF($10.6M). GRLVF YTD gains are higher at: 140.577 vs. GSCCF (-26.619). GRLVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.7M vs. GSCCF (-9.59M). GSCCF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. GRLVF (605K). GRLVF has less debt than GSCCF: GRLVF (40K) vs GSCCF (300K).
GRLVFGSCCFGRLVF / GSCCF
Capitalization10.6M419M3%
EBITDA-2.7M-9.59M28%
Gain YTD140.577-26.619-528%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash605K69.3M1%
Total Debt40K300K13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRLVF vs GSCCF: Fundamental Ratings
GRLVF
GSCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
9691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3592
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRLVF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSCCF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSCCF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (96). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSCCF (92). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRLVF (100). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLVFGSCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNIVX11.69N/A
N/A
Barrow Hanley International Value I
MIDHX32.57N/A
N/A
MFS International New Discovery R3
BMIAX7.38N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Income Stock A
MRGEX24.60N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts IR
MVISX45.59N/A
N/A
Patient Opportunity IS

GRLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLVF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLVF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLVF
1D Price
Change %
GRLVF100%
+9.09%
DCNNF - GRLVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - GRLVF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.91%
HANNF - GRLVF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
GSCCF - GRLVF
5%
Poorly correlated
+11.54%
GPPRF - GRLVF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More

GSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSCCF and IONR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSCCF and IONR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSCCF
1D Price
Change %
GSCCF100%
+11.54%
IONR - GSCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
ADMLF - GSCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
GTCDF - GSCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - GSCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - GSCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
More