GRMN
Price
$218.92
Change
+$1.88 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.55B
19 days until earnings call
MLAB
Price
$142.63
Change
+$0.37 (+0.26%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:19 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
591.89M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GRMN vs MLAB

Header iconGRMN vs MLAB Comparison
Open Charts GRMN vs MLABBanner chart's image
Garmin
Price$218.92
Change+$1.88 (+0.87%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.55B
Mesa Laboratories
Price$142.63
Change+$0.37 (+0.26%)
Volume$173
Capitalization591.89M
GRMN vs MLAB Comparison Chart
Loading...
GRMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRMN vs. MLAB commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRMN is a Buy and MLAB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (GRMN: $217.04 vs. MLAB: $142.25)
Brand notoriety: GRMN and MLAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRMN: 87% vs. MLAB: 44%
Market capitalization -- GRMN: $28.55B vs. MLAB: $591.89M
GRMN [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $28.55B. MLAB’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $591.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRMN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRMN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MLAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRMN is a better buy in the long-term than MLAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLAB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRMN is a better buy in the short-term than MLAB.

Price Growth

GRMN (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while MLAB (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +7.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRMN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

MLAB is expected to report earnings on Jun 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+7.00% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRMN($28.5B) has a higher market cap than MLAB($592M). MLAB has higher P/E ratio than GRMN: MLAB (660.35) vs GRMN (21.96). MLAB YTD gains are higher at: 7.871 vs. GRMN (5.226). GRMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. MLAB (38.9M). GRMN has more cash in the bank: 1.97B vs. MLAB (28.2M). GRMN has less debt than MLAB: GRMN (113M) vs MLAB (236M). GRMN has higher revenues than MLAB: GRMN (5.23B) vs MLAB (213M).
GRMNMLABGRMN / MLAB
Capitalization28.5B592M4,814%
EBITDA1.27B38.9M3,265%
Gain YTD5.2267.87166%
P/E Ratio21.96660.353%
Revenue5.23B213M2,454%
Total Cash1.97B28.2M6,979%
Total Debt113M236M48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRMN vs MLAB: Fundamental Ratings
GRMN
MLAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
4398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRMN's Valuation (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLAB (91) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLAB’s over the last 12 months.

GRMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLAB (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew significantly faster than MLAB’s over the last 12 months.

GRMN's SMR Rating (43) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLAB (98) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLAB’s over the last 12 months.

GRMN's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as MLAB (41) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew similarly to MLAB’s over the last 12 months.

GRMN's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLAB (87) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLAB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRMNMLAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GRMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIP33.571.44
+4.48%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
VREX13.990.39
+2.87%
Varex Imaging Corp
BOOT174.521.08
+0.62%
Boot Barn Holdings
POLA2.93-0.07
-2.33%
Polar Power Inc
QRTEB2.30-0.06
-2.67%
Qurate Retail

GRMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRMN and FTV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRMN and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRMN
1D Price
Change %
GRMN100%
+1.26%
FTV - GRMN
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
ESE - GRMN
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
NOVT - GRMN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
HXGBY - GRMN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
MLAB - GRMN
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.04%
More

MLAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAB has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAB jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLAB
1D Price
Change %
MLAB100%
+4.04%
NOVT - MLAB
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
ESE - MLAB
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
FARO - MLAB
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.78%
TRMB - MLAB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
VNT - MLAB
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
More