GRNQ
Price
$1.71
Change
+$0.18 (+11.76%)
Updated
Jun 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.6M
ROMA
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.22 (-7.64%)
Updated
Jun 13, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRNQ vs ROMA

Header iconGRNQ vs ROMA Comparison
Open Charts GRNQ vs ROMABanner chart's image
Greenpro Capital
Price$1.71
Change+$0.18 (+11.76%)
Volume$200
Capitalization10.6M
Roma Green Finance
Price$2.66
Change-$0.22 (-7.64%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization11.05M
GRNQ vs ROMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
ROMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRNQ vs. ROMA commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRNQ is a StrongBuy and ROMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GRNQ: $1.53 vs. ROMA: $2.88)
Brand notoriety: GRNQ and ROMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRNQ: 157% vs. ROMA: 27%
Market capitalization -- GRNQ: $10.6M vs. ROMA: $11.05M
GRNQ [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $10.6M. ROMA’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $11.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ROMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRNQ and ROMA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ROMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ROMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GRNQ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +22.40% price change this week, while ROMA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -19.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRNQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.75% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ROMA($11.1M) and GRNQ($10.6M) have the same market capitalization . ROMA YTD gains are higher at: 269.231 vs. GRNQ (37.838).
GRNQROMAGRNQ / ROMA
Capitalization10.6M11.1M95%
EBITDA2.96MN/A-
Gain YTD37.838269.23114%
P/E Ratio3.86N/A-
Revenue3.29MN/A-
Total Cash2.5MN/A-
Total Debt155KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRNQ: Fundamental Ratings
GRNQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EITEX44.40N/A
N/A
Parametric Tax-Managed Emerg Mkt I
VSFIX23.44N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value IS
FSZZX10.03N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq Z
DISAX24.21N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund A
GIIYX13.68N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Intl Eq Idx Instl

GRNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNQ and SMX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNQ and SMX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRNQ
1D Price
Change %
GRNQ100%
+14.18%
SMX - GRNQ
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
REZI - GRNQ
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
ADT - GRNQ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
RGP - GRNQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CASS - GRNQ
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

ROMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ROMA and AFYA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROMA and AFYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROMA
1D Price
Change %
ROMA100%
-4.00%
AFYA - ROMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDTK - ROMA
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
TAL - ROMA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSG - ROMA
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.56%
INTJ - ROMA
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
More