Advertisement
GRNQ vs ROMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRNQ is a Hold and ROMA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GRNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GRNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ROMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GRNQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GRNQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- ROMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GRNQ (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while ROMA (@Data Processing Services) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.12%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (+3.09% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| GRNQ | ROMA | GRNQ / ROMA | |
| Capitalization | 11.6M | 167M | 7% |
| EBITDA | -849.6K | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.324 | 260.051 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.30 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.26M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 833K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 80.2K | N/A | - |
GRNQ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GRNQ | ROMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
GRNQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNQ and SMX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNQ and SMX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRNQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRNQ | 100% | +2.99% | ||
| SMX - GRNQ | 29% Poorly correlated | -9.88% | ||
| REZI - GRNQ | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
| ADT - GRNQ | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| RGP - GRNQ | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.95% | ||
| CASS - GRNQ | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||
ROMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ROMA and AFYA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROMA and AFYA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROMA | 100% | +5.68% | ||
| AFYA - ROMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
| EDTK - ROMA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| TAL - ROMA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
| QSG - ROMA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| RELX - ROMA | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||