GRPFF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.07 (-12.28%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
IIJIF
Price
$20.41
Change
+$1.48 (+7.82%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRPFF vs IIJIF

Header iconGRPFF vs IIJIF Comparison
Open Charts GRPFF vs IIJIFBanner chart's image
Grupo Televisa S.A
Price$0.50
Change-$0.07 (-12.28%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization1.33B
Internet Initiative Japan
Price$20.41
Change+$1.48 (+7.82%)
Volume$1
Capitalization3.51B
GRPFF vs IIJIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IIJIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRPFF vs. IIJIF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPFF is a Hold and IIJIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (GRPFF: $0.50 vs. IIJIF: $20.41)
Brand notoriety: GRPFF and IIJIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRPFF: 66% vs. IIJIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GRPFF: $1.33B vs. IIJIF: $3.51B
GRPFF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.33B. IIJIF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRPFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIIJIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GRPFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IIJIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IIJIF is a better buy in the long-term than GRPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRPFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IIJIF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRPFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IIJIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IIJIF is a better buy in the short-term than GRPFF.

Price Growth

GRPFF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -12.84% price change this week, while IIJIF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IIJIF($3.51B) has a higher market cap than GRPFF($1.34B). IIJIF has higher P/E ratio than GRPFF: IIJIF (26.19) vs GRPFF (0.05). GRPFF YTD gains are higher at: 47.493 vs. IIJIF (1.472). IIJIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 61.2B vs. GRPFF (19.5B). GRPFF (38.5B) and IIJIF (38B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . IIJIF has less debt than GRPFF: IIJIF (33.6B) vs GRPFF (93.5B). IIJIF has higher revenues than GRPFF: IIJIF (304B) vs GRPFF (60.3B).
GRPFFIIJIFGRPFF / IIJIF
Capitalization1.34B3.51B38%
EBITDA19.5B61.2B32%
Gain YTD47.4931.4723,227%
P/E Ratio0.0526.190%
Revenue60.3B304B20%
Total Cash38.5B38B101%
Total Debt93.5B33.6B278%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRPFF vs IIJIF: Fundamental Ratings
GRPFF
IIJIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10024
SMR RATING
1..100
9251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IIJIF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRPFF (97). This means that IIJIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

IIJIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRPFF (100). This means that IIJIF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

IIJIF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRPFF (92). This means that IIJIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRPFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IIJIF (48). This means that GRPFF’s stock grew similarly to IIJIF’s over the last 12 months.

IIJIF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRPFF (98). This means that IIJIF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRPFFIIJIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IIJIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPGFX15.050.14
+0.94%
EuroPac Gold A
GSIFX31.810.17
+0.54%
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG A
BEGRX18.30-0.03
-0.16%
Franklin Mutual Beacon Z
RSINX16.43-0.05
-0.30%
Victory RS Investors A
MFELX135.25-0.46
-0.34%
MFS Growth R1

GRPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRPFF and FNCTF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRPFF and FNCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRPFF
1D Price
Change %
GRPFF100%
N/A
FNCTF - GRPFF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
HUTCY - GRPFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMUY - GRPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLTOY - GRPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
IIJIF - GRPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IIJIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IIJIF and CVHSY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIJIF and CVHSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IIJIF
1D Price
Change %
IIJIF100%
N/A
CVHSY - IIJIF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUVR - IIJIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - IIJIF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KKPNF - IIJIF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
KDDIY - IIJIF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
More