Ad is loading...
GRPM vs SCHA
GRPM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts GRPM vs SCHA
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
Price$110.39
Change-$2.13 (-1.89%)
Volume$49.68K
Net Assets588.24M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$25.61
Change-$0.72 (-2.73%)
Volume$2.24M
Net Assets18.47B
GRPM vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRPM vs. SCHA commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPM is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.5B vs. GRPM (588M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than GRPM: SCHA (1.817) vs GRPM (-0.204). GRPM was incepted earlier than SCHA: GRPM (14 years) vs SCHA (15 years). GRPM has a higher turnover SCHA (9.00) vs SCHA (9.00).
| GRPM | SCHA | GRPM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -0.204 | 1.817 | -11% |
| Net Assets | 588M | 18.5B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 9.00 | 367% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 1.31 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GRPM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GRPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPM has been closely correlated with WLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRPM jumps, then WLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPM | 100% | -1.05% | ||
| WLK - GRPM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| UFPI - GRPM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| TMHC - GRPM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| KBH - GRPM | 72% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| TOL - GRPM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -1.13% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||