Ad is loading...
GRPM vs SCHA
GRPM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts GRPM vs SCHA
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
Price$108.01
Change+$3.97 (+3.82%)
Volume$27.24K
Net Assets450.41M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$24.52
Change+$0.87 (+3.68%)
Volume$2.97M
Net Assets16.26B
GRPM vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRPM vs. SCHA commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPM is a Buy and SCHA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 16.3B vs. GRPM (450M). GRPM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHA: GRPM (-3.835) vs SCHA (-4.966). GRPM was incepted earlier than SCHA: GRPM (14 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GRPM (0.35). GRPM has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| GRPM | SCHA | GRPM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -3.835 | -4.966 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 450M | 16.3B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Turnover | 114.00 | 11.00 | 1,036% |
| Yield | 1.20 | 1.72 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GRPM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GRPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPM has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRPM jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPM | 100% | +3.82% | ||
| ITT - GRPM | 86% Closely correlated | +4.36% | ||
| PK - GRPM | 79% Closely correlated | +7.61% | ||
| TEX - GRPM | 78% Closely correlated | +8.77% | ||
| HWC - GRPM | 77% Closely correlated | +5.30% | ||
| LECO - GRPM | 75% Closely correlated | +4.85% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +3.68% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.86% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.90% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.20% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +5.06% | ||
More | ||||