Ad is loading...
GRPM vs SMMD
GRPM vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts GRPM vs SMMD
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
Price$94.28
Change-$4.52 (-4.57%)
Volume$104
Net Assets515.8M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$56.69
Change-$2.88 (-4.83%)
Volume$3.75K
Net Assets1.31B
GRPM vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRPM vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPM is a Hold and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.31B vs. GRPM (516M). GRPM (-12.030) and SMMD (-12.134) have matching annual dividend yield . GRPM was incepted earlier than SMMD: GRPM (14 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GRPM (0.35). GRPM has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| GRPM | SMMD | GRPM / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -12.030 | -12.134 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 516M | 1.31B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.15 | 233% |
| Turnover | 114.00 | 9.00 | 1,267% |
| Yield | 1.15 | 1.42 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GRPM | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GRPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPM has been closely correlated with WLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRPM jumps, then WLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPM | 100% | -7.64% | ||
| WLK - GRPM | 75% Closely correlated | -7.62% | ||
| UFPI - GRPM | 74% Closely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| TMHC - GRPM | 73% Closely correlated | -6.08% | ||
| KBH - GRPM | 72% Closely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| TOL - GRPM | 72% Closely correlated | -7.97% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -6.56% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.62% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -16.17% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.93% | ||
More | ||||