GRPOF
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.09 (-10.84%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
418.73M
JFBHF
Price
$182.32
Change
-$3.68 (-1.98%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Ad is loading...

GRPOF vs JFBHF

Header iconGRPOF vs JFBHF Comparison
Open Charts GRPOF vs JFBHFBanner chart's image
GRUPO TRAXION S A B DE C V
Price$0.74
Change-$0.09 (-10.84%)
Volume$18K
Capitalization418.73M
Jungfraubahn Holding Ag
Price$182.32
Change-$3.68 (-1.98%)
Volume$1
Capitalization1.31B
GRPOF vs JFBHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRPOF vs. JFBHF commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPOF is a Hold and JFBHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GRPOF: $0.74 vs. JFBHF: $182.32)
Brand notoriety: GRPOF and JFBHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRPOF: 168% vs. JFBHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GRPOF: $418.73M vs. JFBHF: $1.31B
GRPOF [@Railroads] is valued at $418.73M. JFBHF’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $132.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $15.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRPOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJFBHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRPOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JFBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JFBHF is a better buy in the long-term than GRPOF.

Price Growth

GRPOF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JFBHF (@Railroads) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+3.45% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFBHF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than GRPOF($419M). GRPOF has higher P/E ratio than JFBHF: GRPOF (12.47) vs JFBHF (11.76). JFBHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. GRPOF (-23.411). GRPOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.15B vs. JFBHF (140M). GRPOF has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. JFBHF (26M). GRPOF has higher revenues than JFBHF: GRPOF (29.1B) vs JFBHF (253M).
GRPOFJFBHFGRPOF / JFBHF
Capitalization419M1.31B32%
EBITDA5.15B140M3,681%
Gain YTD-23.4110.000-
P/E Ratio12.4711.76106%
Revenue29.1B253M11,502%
Total Cash1.46B26M5,600%
Total Debt13.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JFBHF: Fundamental Ratings
JFBHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRIDX62.980.52
+0.83%
T. Rowe Price International Discovery
FSSLX10.070.08
+0.80%
Fidelity Series Small Cap Core
NMIMX24.360.04
+0.16%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst
BINAX8.96N/A
N/A
BlackRock Infrastructure Sust Opps Inv A
WSBFX20.97-0.10
-0.47%
Boston Trust Walden Balanced

GRPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRPOF and MTRJF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRPOF and MTRJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRPOF
1D Price
Change %
GRPOF100%
N/A
MTRJF - GRPOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBHF - GRPOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGROY - GRPOF
0%
Poorly correlated
+19.37%
EJPRY - GRPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
MTCPY - GRPOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JFBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFBHF and FGROF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFBHF and FGROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFBHF
1D Price
Change %
JFBHF100%
N/A
FGROF - JFBHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRY - JFBHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
GRPOF - JFBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRJF - JFBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTCPY - JFBHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More