Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRPZ vs SCHA
GRPZ vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts GRPZ vs SCHA
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF
Price$25.34
Change-$0.56 (-2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$26.91
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$16.11K
Net Assets18.11B
GRPZ vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRPZ vs. SCHA commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPZ is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.1B vs. GRPZ (2.54M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than GRPZ: SCHA (5.169) vs GRPZ (0.242). GRPZ was incepted earlier than SCHA: GRPZ (2 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GRPZ (0.35). GRPZ has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| GRPZ | SCHA | GRPZ / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 0.242 | 5.169 | 5% |
| Net Assets | 2.54M | 18.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 11.00 | 600% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 1.41 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GRPZ | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GRPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPZ has been loosely correlated with CRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRPZ jumps, then CRK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRK - GRPZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| FELE - GRPZ | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| ALG - GRPZ | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| AWI - GRPZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| RUSHA - GRPZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.69% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||