Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRRPX vs RNWBX
GRRPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GRRPX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts R
Price$10.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
GRRPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRRPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRRPX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. GRRPX (2.62B). GRRPX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GRRPX (0.59) vs RNWBX (0.12). GRRPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GRRPX (12 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GRRPX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). GRRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). GRRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GRRPX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GRRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.82 vs. RNWBX (17.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.89 vs. GRRPX (9.02).
| GRRPX | RNWBX | GRRPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.67 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.208 | 22.896 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 74.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.12 | 502% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.82 | 17.87 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.30 | 43.03 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.02 | 15.89 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.54 | 82.21 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement