GRSLF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.86M
MCHHF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
208.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRSLF vs MCHHF

Header iconGRSLF vs MCHHF Comparison
Open Charts GRSLF vs MCHHFBanner chart's image
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$168.25K
Capitalization10.86M
MacMahon Holdings
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization208.11M
GRSLF vs MCHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRSLF vs. MCHHF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSLF is a Hold and MCHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GRSLF: $0.16 vs. MCHHF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: GRSLF and MCHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRSLF: 57% vs. MCHHF: 31%
Market capitalization -- GRSLF: $10.86M vs. MCHHF: $208.11M
GRSLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.86M. MCHHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $208.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRSLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRSLF and MCHHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRSLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCHHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHHF is a better buy in the short-term than GRSLF.

Price Growth

GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while MCHHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHHF($208M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($10.9M). GRSLF YTD gains are higher at: 43.173 vs. MCHHF (-12.546). MCHHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 284M vs. GRSLF (-19.73M). MCHHF has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. GRSLF (1.49M). MCHHF has higher revenues than GRSLF: MCHHF (1.88B) vs GRSLF (0).
GRSLFMCHHFGRSLF / MCHHF
Capitalization10.9M208M5%
EBITDA-19.73M284M-7%
Gain YTD43.173-12.546-344%
P/E RatioN/A6.39-
Revenue01.88B-
Total Cash1.49M198M1%
Total DebtN/A413M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRSLF vs MCHHF: Fundamental Ratings
GRSLF
MCHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1895
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
1086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRSLF (63). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (100). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHHF (86). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHHF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHHF (58). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to MCHHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHHF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRSLF (100). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRSLFMCHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGKCX13.580.14
+1.04%
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence C
MDVZX8.660.05
+0.58%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
GSPSX32.470.16
+0.50%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Svc
PWCIX88.090.39
+0.44%
Principal Capital Appreciation Inst
RGOIX23.170.09
+0.39%
RBC Global Opportunities I

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
-5.72%
AAGFF - GRSLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
AGXPF - GRSLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
FCX - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
TECK - GRSLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.04%
EMX - GRSLF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
More

MCHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHHF and AOTVF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHHF and AOTVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHHF
1D Price
Change %
MCHHF100%
N/A
AOTVF - MCHHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.66%
NICMF - MCHHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGXXF - MCHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
GRSLF - MCHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.72%
QCCUF - MCHHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More