GRSLF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
TSKFF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

GRSLF vs TSKFF

Header iconGRSLF vs TSKFF Comparison
Open Charts GRSLF vs TSKFFBanner chart's image
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100.73K
CapitalizationN/A
Talisker Resources
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
GRSLF vs TSKFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRSLF vs. TSKFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSLF is a Hold and TSKFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GRSLF: $0.13 vs. TSKFF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: GRSLF and TSKFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRSLF: 36% vs. TSKFF: 5%
Market capitalization -- GRSLF: $10.86M vs. TSKFF: $24.67M
GRSLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.86M. TSKFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $24.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRSLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSKFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSKFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than TSKFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRSLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSKFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TSKFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSKFF is a better buy in the short-term than GRSLF.

Price Growth

GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.57% price change this week, while TSKFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -15.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSKFF($24.7M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($10.9M). GRSLF YTD gains are higher at: 104.751 vs. TSKFF (6.415). TSKFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -16.77M vs. GRSLF (-19.73M). TSKFF has more cash in the bank: 4M vs. GRSLF (1.49M). GRSLF (0) and TSKFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRSLFTSKFFGRSLF / TSKFF
Capitalization10.9M24.7M44%
EBITDA-19.73M-16.77M118%
Gain YTD104.7516.4151,633%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.49M4M37%
Total DebtN/A209K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRSLF vs TSKFF: Fundamental Ratings
GRSLF
TSKFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRSLF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as TSKFF (99). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to TSKFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TSKFF (100). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to TSKFF’s over the last 12 months.

TSKFF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (99). This means that TSKFF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TSKFF (63). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to TSKFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSKFF (100). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSKFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRSLFTSKFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMOEX8.00N/A
N/A
MassMutual International Eq Y
AEPCX55.49-0.20
-0.36%
American Funds Europacific Growth C
ASIYX27.82-0.17
-0.61%
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Y
AVEGX52.91-0.33
-0.62%
Ave Maria Growth
JISGX23.03-0.26
-1.12%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth L

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
-1.17%
AAGFF - GRSLF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
AGXPF - GRSLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
FCX - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
TECK - GRSLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
EMX - GRSLF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

TSKFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSKFF and AZZTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSKFF and AZZTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSKFF
1D Price
Change %
TSKFF100%
-0.15%
AZZTF - TSKFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.89%
AGXPF - TSKFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.98%
GRSLF - TSKFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
VZLA - TSKFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
FSUMF - TSKFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.17%
More