Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs NRCFX
GRSRX vs NRCFX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs NRCFX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$52.73
Change-$0.22 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate C
Price$12.32
Change-$0.04 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.01M
GRSRX vs NRCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. NRCFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and NRCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. NRCFX (34M). GRSRX pays higher dividends than NRCFX: GRSRX (2.24) vs NRCFX (1.71). GRSRX was incepted earlier than NRCFX: GRSRX (11 years) vs NRCFX (24 years). NRCFX (2.33) is less costly to investors than GRSRX (1.34). NRCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRCFX: GRSRX (0) vs NRCFX (2500). NRCFX (5.93) and GRSRX (5.79) have marching annual gain over last year. GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 35.67 vs. NRCFX (25.56).
| GRSRX | NRCFX | GRSRX / NRCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.91 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.33 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.069 | 1.568 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 34M | 5,715% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 1.71 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 5.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.67 | 25.56 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.58 | -17.95 | -170% |