Ad is loading...
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$51.34
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.19
Change-$0.12 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.4M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. SWASX (275M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.34) vs GRSRX (2.29). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GRSRX (52.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. GRSRX (6.09). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.89 vs. SWASX (39.73).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.71 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.71 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.306 | 1.607 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 275M | 656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 3.34 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.09 | 7.09 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.75 | -12.62 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.89 | 39.73 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.53 | 19.22 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...