Ad is loading...
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$51.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.22
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.32M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. SWASX (284M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.36) vs GRSRX (2.46). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (10 years) vs SWASX (18 years). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. GRSRX (52.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX (5.57) and GRSRX (5.50) have marching annual gain over last year. GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : -0.20 vs. SWASX (-13.40).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.469 | -0.797 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 284M | 618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.36 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 5.57 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.66 | -14.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.20 | -13.40 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.40 | 18.33 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...