Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$54.74
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.68
Change-$0.04 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.22M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. SWASX (289M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.17) vs GRSRX (2.26). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. GRSRX (2.03). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. SWASX (14.45).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.396 | 10.009 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 289M | 712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 3.17 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 5.66 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | 20.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.42 | 14.45 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.86 | 34.73 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement