Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$52.99
Change+$0.26 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.7M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. SWASX (275M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.30) vs GRSRX (2.24). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. GRSRX (5.79). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 35.67 vs. SWASX (26.97).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.71 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.71 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.069 | 3.057 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 275M | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 3.30 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 7.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.72 | 0.62 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.67 | 26.97 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.58 | 22.40 | 137% |