Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$53.73
Change-$0.49 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.51
Change-$0.07 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.02M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. SWASX (284M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.30) vs GRSRX (2.29). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. GRSRX (4.23). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 31.41 vs. SWASX (22.99).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.396 | 7.145 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 284M | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 3.30 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 7.11 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 11.56 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.41 | 22.99 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.42 | 30.42 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement