GRWG
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.04 (-2.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
90.26M
60 days until earnings call
TLF
Price
$3.07
Change
+$0.02 (+0.66%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.77M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRWG vs TLF

Header iconGRWG vs TLF Comparison
Open Charts GRWG vs TLFBanner chart's image
GrowGeneration
Price$1.51
Change-$0.04 (-2.58%)
Volume$656.28K
Capitalization90.26M
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$3.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.66%)
Volume$9.71K
Capitalization24.77M
GRWG vs TLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRWG vs. TLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRWG is a Hold and TLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GRWG: $1.51 vs. TLF: $3.07)
Brand notoriety: GRWG and TLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRWG: 100% vs. TLF: 61%
Market capitalization -- GRWG: $90.26M vs. TLF: $24.77M
GRWG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $90.26M. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $24.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $51.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRWG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRWG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the long-term than GRWG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRWG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRWG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRWG is a better buy in the short-term than TLF.

Price Growth

GRWG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -11.18% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRWG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

TLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.38% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRWG($90.3M) has a higher market cap than TLF($24.8M). GRWG YTD gains are higher at: -10.651 vs. TLF (-11.386). TLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.3M vs. GRWG (-30.55M). GRWG has more cash in the bank: 48.7M vs. TLF (16.4M). TLF has less debt than GRWG: TLF (11.4M) vs GRWG (33.2M). GRWG has higher revenues than TLF: GRWG (164M) vs TLF (74.6M).
GRWGTLFGRWG / TLF
Capitalization90.3M24.8M364%
EBITDA-30.55M5.3M-576%
Gain YTD-10.651-11.38694%
P/E RatioN/A38.37-
Revenue164M74.6M220%
Total Cash48.7M16.4M297%
Total Debt33.2M11.4M291%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRWG vs TLF: Fundamental Ratings
GRWG
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2486
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9742
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
164
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GRWG (84). This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to GRWG’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GRWG (100). This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to GRWG’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRWG (97). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRWG’s over the last 12 months.

GRWG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TLF (63). This means that GRWG’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as GRWG (16). This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to GRWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRWGTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIPC39.910.17
+0.43%
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp
ATAI4.570.01
+0.22%
ATAI Life Sciences NV
SEGG6.10-0.05
-0.81%
Lottery. com Inc
EQNR23.81-0.23
-0.96%
Equinor ASA
HWBK31.39-0.38
-1.20%
Hawthorn Bancshares

GRWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRWG has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRWG jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRWG
1D Price
Change %
GRWG100%
-2.58%
HNST - GRWG
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
CVNA - GRWG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
FND - GRWG
39%
Loosely correlated
+5.70%
RDNW - GRWG
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
CPRT - GRWG
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and CHPT have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and CHPT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
+0.65%
CHPT - TLF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
LESL - TLF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
GRWG - TLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
JZXN - TLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
ONEW - TLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
More