GS
Price
$470.13
Change
-$41.10 (-8.04%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
134.2B
9 days until earnings call
MCO
Price
$402.60
Change
-$39.79 (-8.99%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.91B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GS vs MCO

Header iconGS vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts GS vs MCOBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$470.13
Change-$41.10 (-8.04%)
Volume$22.24K
Capitalization134.2B
Moody's
Price$402.60
Change-$39.79 (-8.99%)
Volume$16.86K
Capitalization71.91B
GS vs MCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. MCO commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $511.23 vs. MCO: $442.39)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. MCO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 190% vs. MCO: 130%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. MCO: $71.91B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. MCO’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $71.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than GS.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -8.53% price change this week, while MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

MCO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.44% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than MCO($71.9B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than GS: MCO (45.12) vs GS (18.08). MCO YTD gains are higher at: -6.369 vs. GS (-10.278). MCO has less debt than GS: MCO (7.27B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than MCO: GS (46.3B) vs MCO (5.73B).
GSMCOGS / MCO
Capitalization134B71.9B186%
EBITDAN/A2.49B-
Gain YTD-10.278-6.369161%
P/E Ratio18.0845.1240%
Revenue46.3B5.73B809%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt333B7.27B4,579%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
GS
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
135
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1224
SMR RATING
1..100
518
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCO's Valuation (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as GS (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (24) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (52) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as GS (80) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TXMD0.97-0.03
-3.00%
TherapeuticsMD
SJT5.25-0.22
-4.02%
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust UBI
PRM9.86-0.63
-6.01%
Perimeter Solutions Inc
SMG53.16-4.80
-8.28%
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The)
HUBS527.79-65.20
-11.00%
HUBSPOT

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
-9.21%
MS - GS
87%
Closely correlated
-9.51%
SF - GS
81%
Closely correlated
-10.87%
EVR - GS
80%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
PIPR - GS
79%
Closely correlated
-11.17%
JEF - GS
76%
Closely correlated
-13.04%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-6.05%
SPGI - MCO
80%
Closely correlated
-4.79%
MORN - MCO
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.64%
NDAQ - MCO
60%
Loosely correlated
-5.76%
GS - MCO
52%
Loosely correlated
-9.21%
MS - MCO
52%
Loosely correlated
-9.51%
More