GS
Price
$625.94
Change
+$12.95 (+2.11%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
134.2B
84 days until earnings call
MCO
Price
$475.85
Change
-$3.15 (-0.66%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
71.91B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GS vs MCO

Header iconGS vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts GS vs MCOBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$625.94
Change+$12.95 (+2.11%)
Volume$3.43M
Capitalization134.2B
Moody's
Price$475.85
Change-$3.15 (-0.66%)
Volume$768.39K
Capitalization71.91B
GS vs MCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. MCO commentary
Jan 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 21, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $625.94 vs. MCO: $475.85)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. MCO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 167% vs. MCO: 127%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. MCO: $71.91B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. MCO’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $71.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than MCO.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.78% price change this week, while MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than MCO($71.9B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than GS: MCO (45.12) vs GS (18.08). GS YTD gains are higher at: 9.312 vs. MCO (0.524). MCO has less debt than GS: MCO (7.27B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than MCO: GS (46.3B) vs MCO (5.73B).
GSMCOGS / MCO
Capitalization134B71.9B186%
EBITDAN/A2.49B-
Gain YTD9.3120.5241,777%
P/E Ratio18.0845.1240%
Revenue46.3B5.73B809%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt333B7.27B4,579%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
GS
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
520
SMR RATING
1..100
517
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6667
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCO's Valuation (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as GS (96) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (20) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (17) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (48) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (67) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSGN5.060.32
+6.75%
Design Therapeutics
ELME14.820.09
+0.61%
Elme Communities
HSY152.87-1.15
-0.75%
Hershey Company (The)
WK112.03-1.67
-1.47%
Workiva
SYPR1.94-0.19
-8.92%
Sypris Solutions