Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.66
Change+$0.11 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.29
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. GSACX (40.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GSACX (0.26). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (51.77) and GSACX (51.44) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.33 vs. GSACX (-27.50).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.569 | 31.304 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 99.4M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 2.90 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.44 | 51.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.36 | 29.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.50 | -0.33 | 8,232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.27 | 48.61 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement