Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$19.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.07M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. GSACX (35.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (3.62) vs GSACX (0.30). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.31 vs. MCDFX (25.23). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.40 vs. GSACX (-25.41).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.697 | 14.103 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 88.3M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 3.62 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.31 | 25.23 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.47 | -0.68 | 2,135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.41 | -4.40 | 578% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.77 | 10.11 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers