Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$23.59
Change-$0.20 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.57M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSACX (42.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSACX (0.24). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.24 vs. MCDFX (14.24). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.35 vs. GSACX (-26.64).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.859 | 35.021 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 104M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 2.78 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.24 | 14.24 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.64 | 40.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.64 | 1.35 | -1,970% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.09 | 48.27 | 60% |