Ad is loading...
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$18.75
Change-$0.55 (-2.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.67M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.00
Change-$0.34 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.29M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 91.3M vs. GSACX (35.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (3.68) vs GSACX (0.31). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). GSACX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.38 vs. GSACX (30.49). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.01 vs. GSACX (-22.31).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.17 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 1.17 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.463 | 12.955 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.7M | 91.3M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 3.68 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.49 | 35.38 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.23 | 1.26 | -1,133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.31 | -2.01 | 1,111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.40 | 26.59 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers