Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$20.88
Change-$0.47 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.42
Change-$0.30 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSACX (37.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSACX (0.28). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.15 vs. GSACX (40.84). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.38 vs. GSACX (-33.57).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.514 | 27.242 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 95.7M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 3.08 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.84 | 44.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.01 | 20.14 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.57 | -5.38 | 624% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.66 | 46.86 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement