Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$19.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.57M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.70
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. GSACX (35.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (3.26) vs GSACX (0.29). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.05 vs. GSACX (28.91). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.02 vs. GSACX (-32.65).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.696 | 17.647 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.6M | 90.4M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 3.26 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.91 | 31.05 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.91 | 6.77 | -117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.65 | -8.02 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.91 | 14.78 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement