Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$20.19
Change+$0.18 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.68M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.11
Change+$0.13 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSACX (36.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSACX (0.28). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.91 vs. GSACX (37.23). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.43 vs. GSACX (-34.47).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.637 | 20.845 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.7M | 95.7M | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 3.08 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.23 | 40.91 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.49 | 11.96 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.47 | -8.43 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.81 | 23.47 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement