Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$19.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.57M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.67M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 50.7M vs. GSACX (35.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.61) vs GSACX (0.29). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.91 vs. TRCLX (18.74). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.47 vs. GSACX (-32.65).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.696 | 14.205 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.6M | 50.7M | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.61 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.91 | 18.74 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.91 | 0.70 | -1,123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.65 | -5.47 | 597% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement