Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$19.31
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.45M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45M vs. GSACX (34.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.69) vs GSACX (0.30). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.84 vs. TRCLX (5.49). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.31 vs. GSACX (-24.75).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.992 | 8.617 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 45M | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.84 | 5.49 | 380% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.40 | -5.40 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.75 | -1.31 | 1,895% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers