Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$23.59
Change-$0.20 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.57M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.37M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.4M vs. GSACX (42.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSACX (0.24). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.24 vs. TRCLX (12.64). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.91 vs. GSACX (-26.64).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.859 | 33.902 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 66.4M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.34 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.24 | 12.64 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.64 | 34.85 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.64 | 1.91 | -1,397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement