Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$20.19
Change+$0.18 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.68M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.73M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 51.7M vs. GSACX (36.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.56) vs GSACX (0.28). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.23 vs. TRCLX (29.59). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.75 vs. GSACX (-34.47).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.637 | 15.720 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.7M | 51.7M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.56 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.23 | 29.59 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.49 | 5.74 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.47 | -9.75 | 354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement