Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$19.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.07M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.63M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.6M vs. GSACX (35.1M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.69) vs GSACX (0.30). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.31 vs. TRCLX (11.10). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.92 vs. GSACX (-25.41).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.697 | 9.848 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 45.6M | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.31 | 11.10 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.47 | -8.94 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.41 | -1.92 | 1,326% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers