Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.66
Change+$0.11 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.35M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. GSACX (40.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.39) vs GSACX (0.26). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.44 vs. TRCLX (46.73). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.43 vs. GSACX (-27.50).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.569 | 28.977 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 62.3M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.39 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.44 | 46.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.36 | 22.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.50 | -2.43 | 1,132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement