Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.06
Change+$0.33 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.53
Change+$0.18 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.49M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 60.5M vs. GSACX (40.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSACX (0.25). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSACX (30.40) and TRCLX (29.20) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -10.23 vs. GSACX (-37.34).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.748 | 26.420 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6M | 60.5M | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.34 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.40 | 29.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.00 | 28.57 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.34 | -10.23 | 365% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement