Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$20.88
Change-$0.47 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.24
Change-$0.29 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.76M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. GSACX (37.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.56) vs GSACX (0.28). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.04 vs. GSACX (40.84). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.48 vs. GSACX (-33.57).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.514 | 28.125 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 59.8M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.56 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.84 | 43.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.01 | 15.95 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.57 | -4.48 | 750% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement