Ad is loading...
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$23.22
Change-$0.20 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.46M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.03
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. GSAEX (34.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (3.57) vs GSAEX (1.38). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (11 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). GSAEX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.78 vs. GSAEX (25.64). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.32 vs. GSAEX (-6.70).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.17 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.17 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.943 | 11.346 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 93.9M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 3.57 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 30.78 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.98 | -3.90 | 435% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.70 | 9.32 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.18 | 16.15 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...