Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$24.77
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.72M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. GSAEX (35.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (3.26) vs GSAEX (1.32). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (11 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (29.86) and GSAEX (28.65) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.09 vs. GSAEX (-27.33).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.622 | 17.560 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.7M | 90.4M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 3.26 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 29.86 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.39 | 7.45 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.33 | -8.09 | 338% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.84 | 14.47 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement