Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.22M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.01
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSAEX (41.2M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSAEX (1.10). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.67 vs. MCDFX (25.55). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.51 vs. GSAEX (-26.09).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.533 | 29.403 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 104M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.78 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.67 | 25.55 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 38.21 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.09 | -3.51 | 744% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.59 | 37.60 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement