Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$26.91
Change+$0.53 (+2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.78
Change+$0.35 (+2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSAEX (37.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSAEX (1.31). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (41.71) and GSAEX (40.99) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.24 vs. GSAEX (-29.30).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.964 | 24.735 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 95.7M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 3.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.99 | 41.71 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.67 | 19.08 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.30 | -7.24 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.71 | 47.92 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement