Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.68
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. GSAEX (40.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GSAEX (1.21). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.64 vs. MCDFX (38.28). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. GSAEX (-19.39).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.386 | 30.959 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 99.4M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.90 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.64 | 38.28 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.96 | 35.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.39 | 2.50 | -775% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.69 | 51.50 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers