Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$27.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.82M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. GSAEX (40.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (2.84) vs GSAEX (1.15). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.22 vs. GSAEX (31.51). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.24 vs. GSAEX (-31.67).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.833 | 30.959 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 99.3M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.84 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.51 | 33.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 29.24 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.67 | -7.24 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.48 | 36.76 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement