Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs TRCLX
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.22M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.49M
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.5M vs. GSAEX (41.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSAEX (1.10). GSAEX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAEX (12 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) and GSAEX (2.05) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAEX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.67 vs. TRCLX (26.37). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.15 vs. GSAEX (-26.09).
| GSAEX | TRCLX | GSAEX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 2.10 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.533 | 31.534 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 63.5M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.67 | 26.37 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 34.01 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.09 | -1.15 | 2,259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement