Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs TRCLX
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.68
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.80
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.41M
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.4M vs. GSAEX (40.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: TRCLX (1.39) vs GSAEX (1.21). GSAEX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAEX (12 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) and GSAEX (2.05) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAEX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.64 vs. TRCLX (35.55). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.11 vs. GSAEX (-19.39).
| GSAEX | TRCLX | GSAEX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 2.10 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.386 | 30.114 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 63.4M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.39 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.64 | 35.55 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.96 | 30.23 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.39 | 2.11 | -920% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement