Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs TRCLX
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$27.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.82M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.62
Change-$0.05 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.71M
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.7M vs. GSAEX (40.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSAEX (1.15). GSAEX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAEX (12 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) and GSAEX (2.05) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAEX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.51 vs. TRCLX (29.22). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -10.87 vs. GSAEX (-31.67).
| GSAEX | TRCLX | GSAEX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 2.10 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.833 | 29.451 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 61.7M | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.34 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.51 | 29.22 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 29.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.67 | -10.87 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement