Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.23M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSAFX (36.2M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSAFX (1.36). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). MCDFX (41.25) and GSAFX (39.78) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.58 vs. GSAFX (-28.57).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.480 | 21.969 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.2M | 95.7M | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 3.08 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.78 | 41.25 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.17 | 13.41 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.57 | -7.58 | 377% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement