Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$22.91
Change+$0.17 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.84M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.66
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. GSAFX (32.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (3.57) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). GSAFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.85 vs. GSAFX (20.68). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.72 vs. GSAFX (-15.65).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.17 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.525 | 6.689 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 93.9M | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.57 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.68 | 22.85 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.88 | 1.41 | -416% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.65 | -1.72 | 908% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers