Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$23.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.46M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.03
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. GSAFX (34.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (3.57) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). GSAFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.78 vs. GSAFX (25.77). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.32 vs. GSAFX (-6.28).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.17 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.017 | 11.346 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 93.9M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.57 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.77 | 30.78 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.75 | -3.90 | 430% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.28 | 9.32 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers