Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$21.84
Change+$0.29 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.56M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.93
Change+$0.16 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.37M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.4M vs. GSAFX (33.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (4.23) vs GSAFX (1.23). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX (27.68) and MCDFX (26.73) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.86 vs. GSAFX (-21.21).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.891 | -0.339 | -558% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.6M | 88.4M | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 4.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 26.73 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.22 | -20.76 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.21 | -8.86 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...