Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$26.99
Change+$0.54 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.78
Change+$0.35 (+2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSAFX (37.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GSAFX (1.25). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). MCDFX (45.15) and GSAFX (43.96) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.99 vs. GSAFX (-27.55).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.612 | 27.760 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 95.7M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.96 | 45.15 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 21.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.55 | -4.99 | 552% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement