Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$29.59
Change-$0.24 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.57M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSAFX (42.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSAFX (1.15). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. MCDFX (14.24). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.35 vs. GSAFX (-20.73).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.040 | 35.021 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 104M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.78 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.49 | 14.24 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.17 | 40.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.73 | 1.35 | -1,533% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.27 | - |