Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MICHX
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MICHX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.23M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$10.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MICHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 66.3M vs. GSAFX (36.2M). GSAFX (1.36) and MICHX (1.35) have matching dividends . GSAFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MICHX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MICHX (54.39). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MICHX (100000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX (39.78) and MICHX (38.01) have marching annual gain over last year. GSAFX return over 5 years is better than : -28.57 vs. MICHX (-45.39).
| GSAFX | MICHX | GSAFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.50 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.480 | 19.647 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.2M | 66.3M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.35 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.78 | 38.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.17 | -7.33 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.57 | -45.39 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement