Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MICHX
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MICHX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$24.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.06M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$9.91
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.19M
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MICHX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 60.2M vs. GSAFX (35.1M). MICHX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MICHX (1.52) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MICHX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MICHX (54.39). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MICHX (100000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. MICHX (15.27). GSAFX return over 5 years is better than : -19.43 vs. MICHX (-45.18).
| GSAFX | MICHX | GSAFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.50 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.312 | 9.823 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 60.2M | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.52 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 15.27 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.69 | -17.96 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.43 | -45.18 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers