Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs MICHX
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MICHX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$22.91
Change+$0.17 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.84M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$9.28
Change+$0.11 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MICHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 65.7M vs. GSAFX (32.8M). MICHX (1.48) and GSAFX (1.44) have matching dividends . GSAFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MICHX (7 years). GSAFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.26). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MICHX (59.05). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MICHX (100000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.68 vs. MICHX (5.63). GSAFX return over 5 years is better than : -15.65 vs. MICHX (-36.47).
| GSAFX | MICHX | GSAFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.26 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.525 | 1.214 | 537% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 65.7M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.68 | 5.63 | 367% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.88 | -13.10 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.65 | -36.47 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers