Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.23M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.42
Change+$0.12 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.91M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 51.9M vs. GSAFX (36.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.56) vs GSAFX (1.36). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.78 vs. TRCLX (30.04). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.16 vs. GSAFX (-28.57).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.480 | 16.477 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.2M | 51.9M | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.56 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.78 | 30.04 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.17 | 6.60 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.57 | -9.16 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement