Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$21.53
Change+$0.17 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.40
Change-$0.18 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.8M vs. GSAFX (34.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (2.49) vs GSAFX (1.23). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (7 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. TRCLX (54.60). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. TRCLX (14.34). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 7.08 vs. GSAFX (-25.55).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.718 | 9.269 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9M | 45.8M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 2.49 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 14.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.65 | -30.72 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.55 | 7.08 | -361% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers