Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$22.91
Change+$0.17 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.84M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.25M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 41.2M vs. GSAFX (32.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.68) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (7 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.55). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.68 vs. TRCLX (7.13). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 5.16 vs. GSAFX (-15.65).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 2.10 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.525 | 3.030 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 41.2M | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.68 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.68 | 7.13 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.88 | 2.40 | -246% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.65 | 5.16 | -303% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers