Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$24.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.06M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.6M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.6M vs. GSAFX (35.1M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.69) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. TRCLX (11.32). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.00 vs. GSAFX (-19.43).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.312 | 9.754 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 45.6M | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 11.32 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.69 | -8.69 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.43 | -2.00 | 971% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement