Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$24.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.57M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.16
Change+$0.12 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.61M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 50.6M vs. GSAFX (35.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.61) vs GSAFX (1.38). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.32 vs. TRCLX (20.53). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.63 vs. GSAFX (-27.23).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.400 | 14.015 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.6M | 50.6M | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.61 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.32 | 20.53 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.83 | -0.32 | 1,533% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.23 | -5.63 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement