Ad is loading...
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$23.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.46M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.10
Change-$0.22 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.5M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 50.5M vs. GSAFX (34.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.68) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (7 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.55). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.77 vs. TRCLX (11.03). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.25 vs. GSAFX (-6.28).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 2.10 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.017 | 7.197 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 50.5M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.68 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.77 | 11.03 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.75 | -9.28 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.28 | 18.25 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers