Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$26.99
Change+$0.54 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.52
Change+$0.17 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.76M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. GSAFX (37.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.39) vs GSAFX (1.25). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX (43.96) and TRCLX (42.79) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.55 vs. GSAFX (-27.55).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.612 | 28.030 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 59.8M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.96 | 42.79 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 17.08 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.55 | -4.55 | 606% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement