Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$23.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.57M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.70
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. GSAGX (35.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (3.26) vs GSAGX (1.20). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (31.05) and GSAGX (29.93) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.02 vs. GSAGX (-28.96).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.203 | 17.647 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.6M | 90.4M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 3.26 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.93 | 31.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.84 | 6.77 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.96 | -8.02 | 361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.40 | 14.78 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement