Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$23.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.04M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSAGX (36M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSAGX (1.19). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.93 vs. GSAGX (36.54). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. GSAGX (-30.53).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.836 | 22.055 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36M | 95.7M | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 3.08 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.54 | 38.93 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.89 | 13.57 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.53 | -7.51 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.07 | 23.54 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement