Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$22.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.06M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.20
Change-$0.29 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. GSAGX (35.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (3.62) vs GSAGX (1.26). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. MCDFX (25.09). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.30 vs. GSAGX (-21.36).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.131 | 14.225 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 88.3M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 3.62 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 25.09 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.59 | 0.09 | -14,343% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.36 | -4.30 | 497% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.62 | 7.16 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement