Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.24
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.29
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. GSAGX (40.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GSAGX (1.10). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAGX (52.52) and MCDFX (51.77) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.33 vs. GSAGX (-23.56).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.282 | 31.304 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 99.4M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.90 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.52 | 51.77 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.08 | 29.39 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.56 | -0.33 | 7,052% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.27 | 48.61 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement