Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$27.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.43
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSAGX (42.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSAGX (1.01). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.29 vs. MCDFX (24.00). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.28 vs. GSAGX (-24.19).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.510 | 33.811 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 104M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 2.78 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.29 | 24.00 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.54 | 38.77 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.19 | 0.28 | -8,723% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.25 | 46.94 | 88% |