Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$27.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.7M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.7M vs. GSAGX (42.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSAGX (1.01). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.29 vs. TRCLX (18.81). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.52 vs. GSAGX (-24.19).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.10 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.510 | 33.049 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 66.7M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.34 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.29 | 18.81 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.54 | 33.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.19 | 0.52 | -4,683% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement