Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.24
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.35M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. GSAGX (40.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.39) vs GSAGX (1.10). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.52 vs. TRCLX (46.73). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.43 vs. GSAGX (-23.56).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.10 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.282 | 28.977 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 62.3M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.39 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.52 | 46.73 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.08 | 22.60 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.56 | -2.43 | 970% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement