Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$23.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.04M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.93M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 52.9M vs. GSAGX (36M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.56) vs GSAGX (1.19). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.54 vs. TRCLX (30.27). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. GSAGX (-30.53).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.10 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.836 | 18.750 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36M | 52.9M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.54 | 30.27 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.89 | 8.42 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.53 | -7.39 | 413% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement