Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$22.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.06M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.6M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.6M vs. GSAGX (35.1M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.69) vs GSAGX (1.26). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. TRCLX (11.32). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.00 vs. GSAGX (-21.36).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.10 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.131 | 9.754 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 45.6M | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.69 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 11.32 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.59 | -8.69 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.36 | -2.00 | 1,067% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement