Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$23.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.57M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.67M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 50.7M vs. GSAGX (35.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.61) vs GSAGX (1.20). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.93 vs. TRCLX (18.74). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.47 vs. GSAGX (-28.96).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.10 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.203 | 14.205 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.6M | 50.7M | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.61 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.93 | 18.74 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.84 | 0.70 | -829% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.96 | -5.47 | 529% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement