Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAHX vs WCMLX
GSAHX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAHX vs WCMLX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$16.58
Change+$0.19 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.93M
GSAHX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAHX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAHX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSAHX has more cash in the bank: 359M vs. WCMLX (43.9M). GSAHX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSAHX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GSAHX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GSAHX (1.41). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GSAHX (69.00). GSAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: GSAHX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). GSAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.82 vs. WCMLX (4.53). GSAHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.52 vs. WCMLX (19.06).
| GSAHX | WCMLX | GSAHX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.99 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.79 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.084 | 3.966 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 43.9M | 818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.82 | 4.53 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 25.42 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.52 | 19.06 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |