Ad is loading...
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$23.00
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.84M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.66
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. GSAIX (32.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (3.57) vs GSAIX (1.42). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (29 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). GSAIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.85 vs. GSAIX (20.42). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.72 vs. GSAIX (-14.87).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.17 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.486 | 6.689 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 93.9M | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 3.57 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.42 | 22.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.12 | 1.41 | -150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | -1.72 | 863% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.45 | -1.65 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...