Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$28.52
Change+$0.15 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.29
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. GSAIX (40.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GSAIX (1.24). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAIX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX (53.06) and MCDFX (51.77) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.33 vs. GSAIX (-21.67).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.569 | 31.304 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 99.4M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.06 | 51.77 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.36 | 29.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.67 | -0.33 | 6,488% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 48.61 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers