Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$26.26
Change-$0.59 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.42
Change-$0.30 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. GSAIX (37.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSAIX (1.35). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAIX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). MCDFX (44.15) and GSAIX (42.37) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.38 vs. GSAIX (-28.21).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.412 | 27.242 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 95.7M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 3.08 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.37 | 44.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.48 | 20.14 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.21 | -5.38 | 525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.57 | 46.86 | 82% |