Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$24.58
Change-$0.34 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.34M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.68
Change-$0.23 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. GSAIX (36.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (3.08) vs GSAIX (1.35). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAIX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.58 vs. GSAIX (35.97). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.85 vs. GSAIX (-29.26).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.326 | 20.240 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.3M | 90.4M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 3.08 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.97 | 38.58 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.17 | 12.62 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.26 | -6.85 | 427% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.56 | 22.52 | 87% |