Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$29.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.46M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSAIX (42.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSAIX (1.14). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAIX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.82 vs. MCDFX (17.40). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.19 vs. GSAIX (-20.35).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.631 | 34.935 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5M | 104M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.78 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.82 | 17.40 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.74 | 39.93 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.35 | 2.19 | -928% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.99 | 48.17 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement