Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBAX vs WCMLX
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GSBAX vs WCMLX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
Price$15.52
Change-$0.14 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.93M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change-$0.11 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.78M
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBAX has more cash in the bank: 375M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). GSBAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSBAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GSBAX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). GSBAX (2.41) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GSBAX (69.00). GSBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: GSBAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). GSBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. WCMLX (4.73). GSBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.57 vs. WCMLX (24.05).
| GSBAX | WCMLX | GSBAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.99 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.41 | 1.79 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.748 | 6.687 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 375M | 44.8M | 837% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | 4.73 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.07 | 41.59 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.57 | 24.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement