Ad is loading...
GSBAX vs WCMLX
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GSBAX vs WCMLX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
Price$13.84
Change+$0.27 (+1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.64M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBAX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBAX has more cash in the bank: 315M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). GSBAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSBAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GSBAX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). GSBAX (2.41) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GSBAX (69.00). GSBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: GSBAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). GSBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). GSBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.73 vs. WCMLX (21.31).
| GSBAX | WCMLX | GSBAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.99 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.41 | 1.86 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.498 | -9.253 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 42.1M | 748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | -6.86 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.77 | 15.89 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.73 | 21.31 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...