Ad is loading...
GSBAX vs WCMLX
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GSBAX vs WCMLX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.19 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets273.83M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.78
Change+$0.16 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBAX has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. WCMLX (38.5M). GSBAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSBAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GSBAX (5 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). GSBAX (2.41) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). GSBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). GSBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: GSBAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). GSBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.53 vs. WCMLX (-17.03). GSBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.74 vs. WCMLX (24.50).
| GSBAX | WCMLX | GSBAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.99 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.41 | 1.86 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.269 | -17.418 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 38.5M | 712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.53 | -17.03 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.61 | -9.46 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.74 | 24.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...