Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBCX vs HBLSX
GSBCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts GSBCX vs HBLSX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder C
Price$25.95
Change+$0.21 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.17
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12B
GSBCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. GSBCX (2.65B). GSBCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: GSBCX (3.51) vs HBLSX (3.24). GSBCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: GSBCX (28 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). GSBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBCX (30.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBCX: HBLSX (0) vs GSBCX (1000). GSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. HBLSX (4.32). GSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.42 vs. HBLSX (16.26).
| GSBCX | HBLSX | GSBCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.96 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.96 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.576 | 8.163 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 12B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.24 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 4.32 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.10 | 14.75 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.42 | 16.26 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.50 | 50.54 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement