Ad is loading...
GSBCX vs HBLSX
GSBCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts GSBCX vs HBLSX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder C
Price$24.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.46B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
GSBCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBCX is a StrongBuy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. GSBCX (2.46B). GSBCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: GSBCX (3.47) vs HBLSX (3.26). GSBCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: GSBCX (28 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). GSBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBCX (30.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBCX: HBLSX (0) vs GSBCX (1000). GSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. HBLSX (3.11). GSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.72 vs. HBLSX (15.97).
| GSBCX | HBLSX | GSBCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.96 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.96 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.997 | 0.281 | -355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 11.5B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 3.26 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 3.11 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 4.27 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.72 | 15.97 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.61 | 28.95 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers