GSBD
Price
$11.67
Change
+$0.06 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.64B
35 days until earnings call
MFIC
Price
$12.45
Change
+$0.04 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
970.97M
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSBD vs MFIC

Header iconGSBD vs MFIC Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs MFICBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$11.67
Change+$0.06 (+0.52%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.64B
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$12.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
Volume$60.06K
Capitalization970.97M
GSBD vs MFIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. MFIC commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Buy and MFIC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GSBD: $11.61 vs. MFIC: $12.41)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and MFIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 135% vs. MFIC: 97%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.64B vs. MFIC: $970.97M
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.64B. MFIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $970.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFIC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFIC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIC is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the short-term than MFIC.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while MFIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.18% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.64B) has a higher market cap than MFIC($971M). GSBD (8.29) and MFIC (8.18) have similar P/E ratio . GSBD YTD gains are higher at: 0.352 vs. MFIC (-2.421). GSBD has more cash in the bank: 76.6M vs. MFIC (16.5M). MFIC has less debt than GSBD: MFIC (1.46B) vs GSBD (1.83B). GSBD has higher revenues than MFIC: GSBD (208M) vs MFIC (133M).
GSBDMFICGSBD / MFIC
Capitalization1.64B971M169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.352-2.421-15%
P/E Ratio8.298.18101%
Revenue208M133M156%
Total Cash76.6M16.5M464%
Total Debt1.83B1.46B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs MFIC: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
MFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8380
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5920
SMR RATING
1..100
1821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5773
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
428
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (4). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (59). This means that MFIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (21). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (73). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (28). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDMFIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TORCX18.52N/A
N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR C
OIEFX24.22N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Income R2
EKSRX6.05N/A
N/A
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr R6
PABCX18.10N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced C
RSERX22.15N/A
N/A
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets R6

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+0.43%
FSK - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
BCSF - GSBD
77%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
FDUS - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
ARCC - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
GBDC - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
More

MFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIC
1D Price
Change %
MFIC100%
+0.49%
FSK - MFIC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
SLRC - MFIC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
ARCC - MFIC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
GSBD - MFIC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
NMFC - MFIC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More